Cyber Monday 2024! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions

Fortinet Exam NSE6_FSW-7.2 Topic 4 Question 8 Discussion

Actual exam question for Fortinet's NSE6_FSW-7.2 exam
Question #: 8
Topic #: 4
[All NSE6_FSW-7.2 Questions]

Exhibit.

Two routes are not installed in the forwarding information base (FIB) as shown in the exnibit. Which two statements about these two route entries are true? (Choose two.)

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: A, B

Contribute your Thoughts:

Gerry
5 months ago
Wait, so these routes are just chilling in the hardware table, but not actually being used? Talk about wasted resources! Someone call the router police!
upvoted 0 times
Anastacia
4 months ago
I know, it's like they're just taking up space for no reason.
upvoted 0 times
...
Shonda
5 months ago
Yeah, it's strange that they're just sitting there unused.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Regenia
5 months ago
I agree with A and D. These routes are probably just backup options in case the main routes go down. Gotta have those redundancies, you know?
upvoted 0 times
Terrilyn
5 months ago
Definitely, you never know when the main routes might fail.
upvoted 0 times
...
Carey
5 months ago
Yeah, having backup routes is always a good idea.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Slyvia
6 months ago
B is definitely wrong, since these routes are not the primary ones. And C doesn't make sense either, since load-balancing requires equal-cost routes.
upvoted 0 times
Paris
5 months ago
D) These two routes are available in the hardware routing table.
upvoted 0 times
...
Rashida
5 months ago
A) These two routes have a higher administrative distance value available to the destination networks.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Gearldine
6 months ago
Haha, looks like someone forgot to configure the routing table properly. This is why I always double-check my work!
upvoted 0 times
Shenika
5 months ago
Aleta: I wonder if those routes will ever be used for load-balancing.
upvoted 0 times
...
Aleta
6 months ago
Definitely, mistakes can happen easily.
upvoted 0 times
...
Anabel
6 months ago
Yeah, double-checking is always a good idea.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Annice
6 months ago
I think the answer is A and D. The two routes not installed in the FIB must have a higher admin distance and be available in the hardware routing table, but not used for forwarding.
upvoted 0 times
Rosalyn
5 months ago
Yes, and they should also be available in the hardware routing table but not used for forwarding.
upvoted 0 times
...
Elise
5 months ago
I agree, the routes must have a higher admin distance to not be installed in the FIB.
upvoted 0 times
...
Cathrine
5 months ago
Yes, and they should also be available in the hardware routing table but not used for forwarding.
upvoted 0 times
...
Jeniffer
5 months ago
That makes sense. They are not used for forwarding but still available.
upvoted 0 times
...
Geoffrey
5 months ago
Yes, you are correct. Those routes must have a higher admin distance and be in the hardware routing table.
upvoted 0 times
...
Nan
5 months ago
I agree, the routes must have a higher admin distance to not be installed in the FIB.
upvoted 0 times
...
Oliva
6 months ago
I think the answer is A and D.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Junita
6 months ago
I agree with you, Stefany. The routes with higher administrative distance are usually preferred.
upvoted 0 times
...
Stefany
6 months ago
I think the correct answers are A and D.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel
az-700  pass4success  az-104  200-301  200-201  cissp  350-401  350-201  350-501  350-601  350-801  350-901  az-720  az-305  pl-300  

Warning: Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at /pass.php:70) in /pass.php on line 77