Cyber Monday 2024! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions
Mail Us support@pass4success.com
Location PL
Mob_nav_barsMENU

Fortinet Exam NSE7_EFW-7.0 Topic 2 Question 27 Discussion

Actual exam question for Fortinet's NSE7_EFW-7.0 exam
Question #: 27
Topic #: 2
[All NSE7_EFW-7.0 Questions]

Exhibits:

Refer to the exhibits, which contain the network topology and BGP configuration for a hub.

An administrator is trying to configure ADVPN with a hub-spoke VPN setup using iBGP. All the VPNs are up and connected to the hub. The hub is receiving route information from both spokes over iBGP; however, the spokes are not receiving route information from each other.

What change must the administrator make to the hub BGP configuration so that the routes learned by one spoke are forwarded to the other spokes?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: B

Source: https://community.fortinet.com/t5/FortiGate/Technical-Tip-Configuring-BGP-route-reflector/ta-p/191503 Source 2: RFC 4456


by Dick at Mar 08, 2024, 03:21 AM

Limited Time Offer

25%

Off

Get Premium NSE7_EFW-7.0 Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF

Contribute your Thoughts:

Submit Cancel
Marquetta
5 months ago
That's a good point, Sueann. It's important to consider all options before making a decision.
upvoted 0 times
...
Sueann
5 months ago
I'm not so sure, maybe option D) Make the configuration of remote-as different from the configuration of local-as could also work.
upvoted 0 times
...
Carissa
6 months ago
I agree with Marquetta, because by configuring the hub as a route reflector client, it will allow the spokes to receive route information from each other.
upvoted 0 times
...
Marquetta
6 months ago
I think the answer is B) Configure the hub as a route reflector client.
upvoted 0 times
...
Felix
6 months ago
I also think the answer is D. This change would ensure proper route forwarding between the spokes.
upvoted 0 times
...
Shala
7 months ago
I disagree, I believe the answer is D. Making the configuration of remote-as different from the configuration of local-as will help in forwarding routes between spokes.
upvoted 0 times
...
Elena
7 months ago
I think the answer is B. If the hub is configured as a route reflector client, it will reflect the routes learned from one spoke to the other spokes.
upvoted 0 times
...
Bea
8 months ago
Agreed. Okay, let's run through the options again and see if we can come to a consensus on the best solution.
upvoted 0 times
...
Ronny
8 months ago
Ah, yes, the exhibits! Let me take a closer look. *squints eyes* Hmm, this is going to require some serious brain power.
upvoted 0 times
Karon
7 months ago
Definitely, but with some brainstorming, we can figure it out.
upvoted 0 times
...
Ira
7 months ago
You're welcome. Networking configurations can be tricky sometimes.
upvoted 0 times
...
Micah
8 months ago
Got it, thanks for the clarification.
upvoted 0 times
...
Theresia
8 months ago
Because in this case, setting the hub as a route reflector client would be the better choice.
upvoted 0 times
...
Mel
8 months ago
But why not option D) Make the configuration of remote-as different from the configuration of local-as?
upvoted 0 times
...
Gary
8 months ago
Oh, that makes sense. The hub needs to reflect routes to the other spokes.
upvoted 0 times
...
Yvette
8 months ago
Option B) Configure the hub as a route reflector client.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Kenneth
8 months ago
Hey, at least we're not being asked to debug OSPF or something. BGP is at least a little more straightforward, right? *chuckles*
upvoted 0 times
...
Bo
8 months ago
Haha, true. But don't jinx it! This exam is already challenging enough without adding more complexity. Let's focus on the task at hand.
upvoted 0 times
...
Eleanor Roosevelt
9 months ago
Having aced the NSE7_EFW-7.0 certification, I can confidently assert its relevance in fortifying networks against evolving cyber threats.
upvoted 1 times
...

Save Cancel
az-700  pass4success  az-104  200-301  200-201  cissp  350-401  350-201  350-501  350-601  350-801  350-901  az-720  az-305  pl-300  

Warning: Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at /pass.php:70) in /pass.php on line 77