Cyber Monday 2024! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions

Fortinet Exam NSE7_EFW-7.2 Topic 4 Question 8 Discussion

Actual exam question for Fortinet's NSE7_EFW-7.2 exam
Question #: 8
Topic #: 4
[All NSE7_EFW-7.2 Questions]

Exhibit.

Refer to the exhibit, which contains a CLI script configuration on fortiManager. An administrator configured the CLI script on FortiManager rut the script tailed to apply any changes to the managed

device after being executed.

What are two reasons why the script did not make any changes to the managed device? (Choose two)

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer

Contribute your Thoughts:

Lucina
6 months ago
Yes, commands starting with # might not run.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lashawna
6 months ago
I believe the commands starting with the # sign might also be a reason for failure.
upvoted 0 times
...
Elmer
6 months ago
I agree with you, incomplete commands can definitely cause issues.
upvoted 0 times
...
Alyce
7 months ago
I think the script didn't work because of incomplete commands.
upvoted 0 times
...
Sue
7 months ago
I don't think so, CLI scripts must start with #! as mentioned in the options.
upvoted 0 times
...
Terina
7 months ago
But do you think static routes can be added using only CLI scripts?
upvoted 0 times
...
Blair
7 months ago
I agree, incomplete commands can also cause CLI scripts to fail.
upvoted 0 times
...
Sue
7 months ago
I think the reason could be because the commands that start with the # sign did not run.
upvoted 0 times
...
Hobert
8 months ago
Ha, reminds me of the time I accidentally ran a script that deleted the entire config on a device. Talk about a bad day at the office! But yeah, incomplete commands are the enemy when it comes to CLI scripts.
upvoted 0 times
...
Francene
8 months ago
You know, I've seen this happen before when the script wasn't properly tested. We really need to make sure our CLI scripts are airtight before running them on production devices. Otherwise, we end up with situations like this.
upvoted 0 times
Royal
7 months ago
D) Absolutely, ensuring the script starts with #! is a basic but essential step.
upvoted 0 times
...
Barabara
7 months ago
A) I agree, it's important to double-check everything to avoid situations like this.
upvoted 0 times
...
Howard
8 months ago
B) Yes, incomplete commands can definitely cause issues when running CLI scripts.
upvoted 0 times
...
Kenneth
8 months ago
D) CLI scripts must start with #!.
upvoted 0 times
...
Ivory
8 months ago
A) That's a good point. Testing scripts thoroughly is crucial before running them on production devices.
upvoted 0 times
...
Casie
8 months ago
B) Incomplete commands can cause CLI scripts to fail.
upvoted 0 times
...
Melissa
8 months ago
A) The commands that start with the # sign did not run.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Daniel
8 months ago
Yeah, I agree that incomplete commands are likely the culprit here. The script looks like it's missing some key information. And the # comments probably didn't help either.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lorean
8 months ago
Hmm, this is an interesting question. I'm a bit unsure about the #! requirement for CLI scripts, but I'm pretty sure incomplete commands can cause issues. What do you all think?
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel
az-700  pass4success  az-104  200-301  200-201  cissp  350-401  350-201  350-501  350-601  350-801  350-901  az-720  az-305  pl-300  

Warning: Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at /pass.php:70) in /pass.php on line 77