Deal of The Day! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions

Fortinet Exam NSE7_LED-7.0 Topic 1 Question 40 Discussion

Actual exam question for Fortinet's NSE7_LED-7.0 exam
Question #: 40
Topic #: 1
[All NSE7_LED-7.0 Questions]

Exhibit.

Refer to the exhibit showing a network topology and SSID settings.

FortiGate is configured to use an external captive portal However wireless users are not able to see the captive portal login page

Which configuration change should the administrator make to fix the problem?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: B

According to the exhibit, the network topology and SSID settings show that FortiGate is configured to use an external captive portal hosted on FortiAuthenticator, which is connected to a Windows AD server for user authentication. However, wireless users are not able to see the captive portal login page, which means that they are not redirected to the external captive portal URL. Therefore, option B is true because adding the FortiAuthenticator and WindowsAD address objects as exempt destinations services will allow the wireless users to access the external captive portal URL without being blocked by the firewall policy. Option A is false because enabling NAT in the firewall policy with the ID 13 will not affect the redirection to the external captive portal URL, but rather the source IP address of the wireless traffic. Option C is false because enabling the captive-portal-exempt option in the firewall policy with the ID 12 will bypass the captive portal authentication for the wireless users, which is not the desired outcome. Option D is false because removing the guest.portal user group in the firewall policy with the ID 12 will prevent the wireless users from being authenticated by FortiGate, which is required for accessing the external captive portal.


Contribute your Thoughts:

Nakisha
14 hours ago
Option C looks promising, but I'm not sure if that's the right approach. Shouldn't we also check the captive portal settings on the FortiGate?
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel
az-700  pass4success  az-104  200-301  200-201  cissp  350-401  350-201  350-501  350-601  350-801  350-901  az-720  az-305  pl-300  

Warning: Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at /pass.php:70) in /pass.php on line 77