Cyber Monday 2024! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions

Fortinet Exam NSE7_LED-7.0 Topic 1 Question 8 Discussion

Actual exam question for Fortinet's NSE7_LED-7.0 exam
Question #: 8
Topic #: 1
[All NSE7_LED-7.0 Questions]

Refer to the exhibits.

Exhibit.

Examine the troubleshooting outputs shown in the exhibits

Users have been reporting issues with the speed of their wireless connection in a particular part of the wireless network The interface that is having issues is the 2 4 GHz interface that is currently configured on channel 6

The administrator of the wireless network has investigated and surveyed the local RF environment using the tools available at the AP and FortiGate

Which configuration would improve the wireless connection?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: B

According to the exhibits, the AP 2.4 GHz interface is currently configured on channel 6, which is overlapping with other nearby APs on channels 4 and 8. This can cause interference and reduce the wireless performance. Therefore, changing the AP 2.4 GHz channel to 1 would improve the wireless connection, as it would avoid the overlapping channels and use a non-overlapping channel instead. Option A is false because changing the AP 2.4 GHz channel to 11 would still overlap with other nearby APs on channels 9 and 13. Option C is false because changing the AP 2.4 GHz channel to 9 would still overlap with other nearby APs on channels 6, 8, and 11. Option D is false because changing the AP 2.4 GHz channel to 13 would still overlap with other nearby APs on channels 9 and 11.


Contribute your Thoughts:

Denna
8 months ago
Ooh, channel testing, my favorite! I bet we can get the wireless connection back up to speed in no time. Just gotta find the sweet spot, you know? Maybe channel 9 will be the hidden gem we're looking for.
upvoted 0 times
...
Julianna
8 months ago
I agree, those would be good options. Although, channel 13 could also work since it's further away from the popular channel 6. Maybe we should test a few different channels and see which one gives the best performance.
upvoted 0 times
...
Monroe
8 months ago
Good point. Changing the channel could help, but we need to be strategic about which channel we choose. The exhibits show the available channels, so I'm thinking we should pick a channel that's not being used as much in the local area, like channel 1 or 11.
upvoted 0 times
...
Christoper
8 months ago
Hmm, this is an interesting question. I'm guessing the issue has to do with channel interference, since the wireless connection is slow in a specific part of the network. Looking at the exhibits, it seems like channel 6 might be crowded, so we should probably try changing the channel to reduce interference.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel
az-700  pass4success  az-104  200-301  200-201  cissp  350-401  350-201  350-501  350-601  350-801  350-901  az-720  az-305  pl-300  

Warning: Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at /pass.php:70) in /pass.php on line 77