Cyber Monday 2024! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions

Fortinet Exam NSE7_LED-7.0 Topic 2 Question 30 Discussion

Actual exam question for Fortinet's NSE7_LED-7.0 exam
Question #: 30
Topic #: 2
[All NSE7_LED-7.0 Questions]

Contribute your Thoughts:

Angelo
2 months ago
I'm going to go with C and D as well. The guest portal should be flexible and customizable, not bogged down with approval processes.
upvoted 0 times
...
Werner
2 months ago
Definitely going with C and D. The other options sound a bit too restrictive for a modern guest portal.
upvoted 0 times
Marshall
20 days ago
I see your point, C and D do seem like the best choices for a modern guest portal.
upvoted 0 times
...
Dorathy
28 days ago
I think B could be important for security reasons, but C and D offer more functionality.
upvoted 0 times
...
Juliann
1 months ago
I agree, C and D seem like the most flexible options for a guest portal.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Lou
2 months ago
Ha! 10 guest accounts? That's a bit excessive. I bet the developer was feeling generous that day.
upvoted 0 times
Tarra
1 months ago
C) The guest portal provides pre and post-log in services
upvoted 0 times
...
Pearline
2 months ago
B) Administrators must approve all guest accounts before they can be used
upvoted 0 times
...
Gladys
2 months ago
A) Each remote user on FortiAuthenticator can sponsor up to 10 guest accounts
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Noel
2 months ago
I'm not sure about A and C, but I think B and D make sense for the guest portal.
upvoted 0 times
...
Tish
2 months ago
Option B seems unnecessary. Why would administrators need to approve all guest accounts? That would be a hassle.
upvoted 0 times
Kristal
1 months ago
And the guest portal on FortiAuthenticator provides pre and post-log in services to enhance security.
upvoted 0 times
...
Kris
1 months ago
True, security is important when it comes to guest access on the network.
upvoted 0 times
...
Barbra
1 months ago
But it could be a security measure to ensure only authorized guests have access.
upvoted 0 times
...
Emeline
2 months ago
I agree, having to approve all guest accounts does seem like a hassle.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Dean
2 months ago
I think options C and D are correct. The guest portal provides pre and post-log in services, and administrators can configure mapping rules using incoming parameters.
upvoted 0 times
Ivan
2 months ago
It's important for administrators to have control over guest accounts before they can be used.
upvoted 0 times
...
Judy
2 months ago
Yes, that's correct. Administrators can also configure mapping rules using incoming parameters.
upvoted 0 times
...
Tamera
2 months ago
I agree, the guest portal does provide pre and post-log in services.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Erasmo
2 months ago
I agree with you, Herschel. I also think D is true because it allows for customization.
upvoted 0 times
...
Herschel
3 months ago
I think B is true because it ensures security.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel
az-700  pass4success  az-104  200-301  200-201  cissp  350-401  350-201  350-501  350-601  350-801  350-901  az-720  az-305  pl-300  

Warning: Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at /pass.php:70) in /pass.php on line 77