Cyber Monday 2024! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions

Fortinet Exam NSE7_NST-7.2 Topic 1 Question 4 Discussion

Actual exam question for Fortinet's NSE7_NST-7.2 exam
Question #: 4
Topic #: 1
[All NSE7_NST-7.2 Questions]

Exhibit.

Refer to the exhibit, which contains partial output from an IKE real-time debug.

The administrator does not have access to the remote gateway.

Based on the debug output, which configuration change can the administrator make to the local gateway to resolve the phase 1 negotiation error?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: B

Analyzing Debug Output:

The debug output shows multiple proposals with encryption algorithms like AES CBC and hashing algorithms like SHA256.

The negotiation failure (no SA proposal chosen) suggests that there is a mismatch in the encryption or hashing algorithms between the local and remote gateways.

Configuration Change:

To resolve the phase 1 negotiation error, the local gateway needs to include a compatible proposal.

Adding AES256-SHA256 to the phase 1 proposal configuration ensures that both gateways have a matching set of encryption and hashing algorithms.


Fortinet Documentation: Configuring IPsec Tunnels (Fortinet Docs) (Welcome to the Fortinet Community!).

Fortinet Community: Troubleshooting IKE Negotiation Failures (Welcome to the Fortinet Community!) (Welcome to the Fortinet Community!).

Contribute your Thoughts:

Rosita
5 months ago
Hey, at least the admin has access to the debug output. That's more than most of us have when troubleshooting VPNs!
upvoted 0 times
...
Nakisha
5 months ago
A) AESCBC-SHA2? Sounds like a fancy encryption algorithm, but I'm not sure it's the right choice here.
upvoted 0 times
Pearly
5 months ago
C) AES128-SHA128 could also work as a configuration change to resolve the error.
upvoted 0 times
...
Venita
5 months ago
B) AES256-SHA256 might be a better option for resolving the phase 1 negotiation error.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Dorthy
5 months ago
C) AES128-SHA128? What is this, the stone age? Get with the times, man!
upvoted 0 times
Lovetta
5 months ago
B) In the phase 1 proposal configuration, add AES256-SHA256 to the list of encryption algorithms.
upvoted 0 times
...
Billy
5 months ago
A) In the phase 1 proposal configuration, add AESCBC-SHA2 to the list of encryption algorithms.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Fabiola
6 months ago
D) IKE version 2 is the way to go. Can't believe they're still using version 1 in this day and age!
upvoted 0 times
Yesenia
5 months ago
D) In the phase 1 network configuration, set the IKE version to 2.
upvoted 0 times
...
Mauricio
5 months ago
B) In the phase 1 proposal configuration, add AES256-SHA256 to the list of encryption algorithms.
upvoted 0 times
...
Benton
6 months ago
A) In the phase 1 proposal configuration, add AESCBC-SHA2 to the list of encryption algorithms.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Jonelle
6 months ago
B) Definitely AES256-SHA256. That's the industry standard for secure VPNs these days.
upvoted 0 times
Bea
5 months ago
D) Setting the IKE version to 2 could also help resolve the negotiation error.
upvoted 0 times
...
Ashley
5 months ago
C) I agree, AES256-SHA256 is a strong encryption algorithm to use.
upvoted 0 times
...
Gayla
5 months ago
A) I think you're right. AES256-SHA256 is the most secure option.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Christiane
6 months ago
I agree with Stacey, adding AESCBC-SHA2 seems like the right choice based on the debug output.
upvoted 0 times
...
Stacey
6 months ago
I think the answer is A) In the phase 1 proposal configuration, add AESCBC-SHA2.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel
az-700  pass4success  az-104  200-301  200-201  cissp  350-401  350-201  350-501  350-601  350-801  350-901  az-720  az-305  pl-300  

Warning: Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at /pass.php:70) in /pass.php on line 77