Cyber Monday 2024! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions
Mail Us support@pass4success.com
Location PL
Mob_nav_barsMENU

Fortinet Exam NSE7_SDW-7.0 Topic 2 Question 19 Discussion

Actual exam question for Fortinet's NSE7_SDW-7.0 exam
Question #: 19
Topic #: 2
[All NSE7_SDW-7.0 Questions]

What are two common use cases for remote internet access (RIA)? (Choose two.)

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: B, C

by Britt at Apr 13, 2024, 11:27 AM

Limited Time Offer

25%

Off

Get Premium NSE7_SDW-7.0 Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF

Contribute your Thoughts:

Submit Cancel
Launa
6 months ago
That's a good point, Ryan. Centralizing security inspection can definitely enhance security measures.
upvoted 0 times
...
Ryan
6 months ago
I believe C is also important. Centralizing security inspection on the hub can help ensure consistency and thoroughness.
upvoted 0 times
...
Nettie
6 months ago
I agree with Launa. Providing direct internet access on spokes and through the hub are definitely common.
upvoted 0 times
...
Launa
6 months ago
I think A and B are common use cases.
upvoted 0 times
...
Florinda
6 months ago
I see where you're coming from, Both sets of options have their benefits depending on the network setup and security requirements.
upvoted 0 times
...
Carman
6 months ago
I actually think B and D are the common use cases. Providing internet access through the hub and thorough inspection on spokes seem more practical to me.
upvoted 0 times
...
Tracie
7 months ago
I agree with Providing direct internet access on spokes and centralizing security inspection on the hub make sense.
upvoted 0 times
...
Ben
7 months ago
I think two common use cases for RIA are A and C.
upvoted 0 times
...
Daniel
8 months ago
You know, I was just thinking the same thing. I think all four options could be valid use cases, depending on the specific requirements and setup. I don't know, I'm starting to feel like this question is a bit of a trick question. Maybe the exam writers are trying to catch us out.
upvoted 0 times
...
Emelda
8 months ago
I'm not so sure about option D, though. Thorough inspection on the spokes? That doesn't really make sense to me.
upvoted 0 times
...
Mickie
8 months ago
Hmm, I'm not so sure about that. I think option B, providing internet access through the hub, could also be a valid use case. That way you can have a single point of control and inspection for all internet traffic. And I'm not convinced that thoroughly inspecting on the spokes is completely redundant - it could provide an extra layer of security.
upvoted 0 times
Carlee
7 months ago
I agree with that. But I also think option C, centralizing security inspection on the hub, is crucial for better security.
upvoted 0 times
...
Krystal
7 months ago
I think option A, providing direct internet access on spokes, is important for efficiency.
upvoted 0 times
...
Dong
8 months ago
D) Provide thorough inspection on spokes
upvoted 0 times
...
Dominga
8 months ago
Hmm, I'm not so sure about that. I think option B, providing internet access through the hub, could also be a valid use case. That way you can have a single point of control and inspection for all internet traffic. And I'm not convinced that thoroughly inspecting on the spokes is completely redundant - it could provide an extra layer of security.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lezlie
8 months ago
C) Centralize security inspection on the hub
upvoted 0 times
...
Lashaunda
8 months ago
B) Provide internet access through the hub
upvoted 0 times
...
Leana
8 months ago
A) Provide direct internet access on spokes
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Herman
8 months ago
Ah, I see. So options B and C would be the common use cases then, right? Providing internet access through the hub and centralizing security inspection.
upvoted 0 times
...
Leigha
8 months ago
I agree with Matt on the use cases. Option A and C make the most sense to me. Providing internet access through the hub, as in option B, seems inefficient and could create a bottleneck. And thoroughly inspecting on the spokes, as in option D, would be redundant if you've already got the centralized security inspection on the hub.
upvoted 0 times
...
Quentin
8 months ago
Ooh, I think I got it! RIA is when you access the internet through a centralized hub, instead of directly from the spoke locations. That way, you can manage security and access control more easily.
upvoted 0 times
...
Matt
8 months ago
Hmm, this is an interesting question. I think the two common use cases for remote internet access (RIA) are A) Provide direct internet access on spokes and C) Centralize security inspection on the hub. Providing direct internet access on the spokes allows users to access the internet without having to go through the hub, which can be more efficient. And centralizing security inspection on the hub ensures that all traffic is thoroughly inspected before reaching the spokes.
upvoted 0 times
...
Jillian
8 months ago
Hmm, let me think about this. I'm guessing it has something to do with accessing the internet from a remote location, like a satellite office or a mobile device.
upvoted 0 times
...
Annita
8 months ago
Yeah, me neither. I've heard the term before, but I'm not sure how it's different from just regular internet access.
upvoted 0 times
...
Billy
8 months ago
I think this question is a bit tricky. I'm not sure if I fully understand the concept of remote internet access (RIA).
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel
az-700  pass4success  az-104  200-301  200-201  cissp  350-401  350-201  350-501  350-601  350-801  350-901  az-720  az-305  pl-300  

Warning: Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at /pass.php:70) in /pass.php on line 77