Cyber Monday 2024! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions

Fortinet Exam NSE7_SDW-7.2 Topic 1 Question 16 Discussion

Actual exam question for Fortinet's NSE7_SDW-7.2 exam
Question #: 16
Topic #: 1
[All NSE7_SDW-7.2 Questions]

Which action fortigate performs on the traffic that is subject to a per-IP traffic shaper of 10 Mbps?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: C

Contribute your Thoughts:

Sonia
3 months ago
Haha, imagine if Fortigate just said 'screw it' and gave each IP a guaranteed 10 Mbps. D is a nice thought, but not very realistic.
upvoted 0 times
...
Hayley
3 months ago
I'm gonna go with C on this one. Limiting each source IP to 10 Mbps makes the most sense for a per-IP traffic shaper.
upvoted 0 times
...
Louvenia
3 months ago
B sounds good to me. Sharing the bandwidth equally among all source IPs seems like the logical way to handle a per-IP traffic shaper.
upvoted 0 times
Florinda
2 months ago
C) Fortigate limits each source ip address to a maximum bandwidth of 10 Mbps.
upvoted 0 times
...
Stephaine
3 months ago
B) FortiGate shares 10 Mbps of bandwidth equally among all source IP addresses.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Jovita
3 months ago
I agree with Hyman, C seems like the correct answer.
upvoted 0 times
...
Hyman
3 months ago
But C makes more sense because it limits each source IP address.
upvoted 0 times
...
Maurine
4 months ago
I disagree, I believe it's D.
upvoted 0 times
...
Hyman
4 months ago
I think the answer is C.
upvoted 0 times
...
France
4 months ago
Hmm, I think C is the correct answer here. The question specifically mentions a 'per-IP traffic shaper of 10 Mbps', so Fortigate should limit each source IP to a max of 10 Mbps.
upvoted 0 times
Veronique
3 months ago
I think C is the correct answer too, it matches the description provided in the question.
upvoted 0 times
...
India
3 months ago
Yes, C makes sense because it aligns with the concept of a per-IP traffic shaper.
upvoted 0 times
...
Mila
4 months ago
I agree, C seems like the most logical choice in this scenario.
upvoted 0 times
...
...

Save Cancel
az-700  pass4success  az-104  200-301  200-201  cissp  350-401  350-201  350-501  350-601  350-801  350-901  az-720  az-305  pl-300  

Warning: Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at /pass.php:70) in /pass.php on line 77