Cyber Monday 2024! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions

Fortinet Exam NSE7_ZTA-7.2 Topic 2 Question 15 Discussion

Actual exam question for Fortinet's NSE7_ZTA-7.2 exam
Question #: 15
Topic #: 2
[All NSE7_ZTA-7.2 Questions]

FortiNAC has alarm mappings configured for MDM compliance failure, and FortiClient EMS is added as a MDM connector When an endpoint is quarantined by FortiClient EMS, what action does FortiNAC perform?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: A

In the scenario where FortiNAC has alarm mappings configured for MDM (Mobile Device Management) compliance failure and FortiClient EMS (Endpoint Management System) is integrated as an MDM connector, the typical response when an endpoint is quarantined by FortiClient EMS is to isolate the host in the registration VLAN. This action is consistent with FortiNAC's approach to network access control, focusing on ensuring network security and compliance. By moving the non-compliant or quarantined host to a registration VLAN, FortiNAC effectively segregates it from the rest of the network, mitigating potential risks while allowing for further investigation or remediation steps. Reference: FortiNAC documentation, MDM Compliance and Response Actions.


Contribute your Thoughts:

Carman
4 months ago
Haha, imagine if FortiNAC just disabled the host entirely. That would be a bit overkill, don't you think?
upvoted 0 times
...
Iraida
4 months ago
Nah, I don't think forcing the host to authenticate again is the right action. That would be too disruptive.
upvoted 0 times
Art
3 months ago
C) The host is forced to authenticate again
upvoted 0 times
...
Tegan
3 months ago
B) The host is marked at risk
upvoted 0 times
...
Felix
3 months ago
A) The host is isolated in the registration VLAN
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Amie
5 months ago
Wait, what if the host is supposed to be isolated in the registration VLAN? I'm not sure about this one.
upvoted 0 times
...
Omer
5 months ago
I agree with Desirae. Option B seems like the most logical choice here.
upvoted 0 times
Percy
3 months ago
C) The host is forced to authenticate again
upvoted 0 times
...
Rosendo
3 months ago
B) The host is marked at risk
upvoted 0 times
...
Elinore
3 months ago
A) The host is isolated in the registration VLAN
upvoted 0 times
...
Vince
3 months ago
Yes, it's important to take action when an endpoint is quarantined.
upvoted 0 times
...
Coletta
4 months ago
I agree, marking the host at risk makes sense.
upvoted 0 times
...
Ernest
4 months ago
I think option B is the correct answer.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Desirae
5 months ago
Hmm, I think the answer is B. FortiNAC should mark the host at risk when FortiClient EMS quarantines it.
upvoted 0 times
Mary
4 months ago
Yes, that's correct. FortiNAC will mark the host at risk in this scenario.
upvoted 0 times
...
Ty
5 months ago
I agree, the host should be marked at risk when quarantined by FortiClient EMS.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Letha
5 months ago
I think the answer is C) The host is forced to authenticate again, to ensure the endpoint meets compliance requirements before accessing the network.
upvoted 0 times
...
Rebecka
5 months ago
I believe the answer is B) The host is marked at risk, as FortiNAC may want to alert administrators about the compliance failure.
upvoted 0 times
...
Pete
5 months ago
I agree with Glynda, because FortiNAC would want to isolate the endpoint to prevent any potential threats.
upvoted 0 times
...
Glynda
5 months ago
I think the answer is A) The host is isolated in the registration VLAN.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel
az-700  pass4success  az-104  200-301  200-201  cissp  350-401  350-201  350-501  350-601  350-801  350-901  az-720  az-305  pl-300  

Warning: Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at /pass.php:70) in /pass.php on line 77