Deal of The Day! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions
Mail Us support@pass4success.com
Location PL
Mob_nav_barsMENU

Fortinet Exam NSE8_812 Topic 3 Question 28 Discussion

Actual exam question for Fortinet's NSE8_812 exam
Question #: 28
Topic #: 3
[All NSE8_812 Questions]

You want to use the MTA adapter feature on FortiSandbox in an HA-Cluster. Which statement about this solution is true?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: B

The MTA adapter feature on FortiSandbox is a feature that allows FortiSandbox to act as a mail transfer agent (MTA) that can receive, inspect, and forward email messages from external sources. The MTA adapter feature can be used to integrate FortiSandbox with third-party email security solutions that do not support direct integration with FortiSandbox, such as Microsoft Exchange Server or Cisco Email Security Appliance (ESA). The MTA adapter feature can also be used to enhance email security by adding an additional layer of inspection and filtering before delivering email messages to the final destination. The MTA adapter feature can be enabled on FortiSandbox in an HA-Cluster, which is a configuration that allows two FortiSandbox units to synchronize their settings and data and provide high availability and load balancing for sandboxing services. However, one statement about this solution that is true is that the MTA adapter is only available in the primary node. This means that only one FortiSandbox unit in the HA-Cluster can act as an MTA and receive email messages from external sources, while the other unit acts as a backup node that can take over the MTA role if the primary node fails or loses connectivity. This also means that only one IP address or FQDN can be used to configure the external sources to send email messages to the FortiSandbox MTA, which is the IP address or FQDN of the primary node. References: https://docs.fortinet.com/document/fortisandbox/3.2.0/administration-guide/19662/mail-transfer-agent-mta https://docs.fortinet.com/document/fortisandbox/3.2.0/administration-guide/19662/high-availability-ha


by Royce at Jul 16, 2024, 02:04 PM

Limited Time Offer

25%

Off

Get Premium NSE8_812 Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF

Contribute your Thoughts:

Submit Cancel
Chandra
10 days ago
I'm going with Option D. The configuration is bound to be different in an HA-Cluster environment compared to a standalone device.
upvoted 0 times
...
Alethea
13 days ago
Haha, I hope the exam doesn't ask us to configure the MTA adapter on a FortiSandbox. That sounds like a real headache!
upvoted 0 times
...
Curt
14 days ago
Hmm, I'm not sure about this one. But C sounds plausible - the MTA adapter might only operate in detection mode in an HA-Cluster.
upvoted 0 times
Yan
2 days ago
User 2: I'm not sure, but D could also be a possibility since the configuration is different in an HA-Cluster.
upvoted 0 times
...
Kati
3 days ago
User 1: I think C is correct, the MTA adapter might only operate in detection mode in an HA-Cluster.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Tamesha
23 days ago
I'm not sure, but I think B) The MTA adapter is only available in the primary node makes sense.
upvoted 0 times
...
Gaynell
26 days ago
I disagree, I believe the answer is D) The configuration is different than on a standalone device.
upvoted 0 times
...
Vallie
28 days ago
I think B is the correct answer. The MTA adapter is only available on the primary node in an HA-Cluster setup.
upvoted 0 times
...
Delila
1 months ago
Option D seems the most likely. The configuration for an HA-Cluster is usually different from a standalone device.
upvoted 0 times
Pamella
16 days ago
Option D seems the most likely. The configuration for an HA-Cluster is usually different from a standalone device.
upvoted 0 times
...
Shalon
18 days ago
D) The configuration is different than on a standalone device.
upvoted 0 times
...
Tyra
19 days ago
A) The configuration of the MTA Adapter Local Interface is different than on port1.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Sanda
1 months ago
I think the answer is A) The configuration of the MTA Adapter Local Interface is different than on port1.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel
az-700  pass4success  az-104  200-301  200-201  cissp  350-401  350-201  350-501  350-601  350-801  350-901  az-720  az-305  pl-300  

Warning: Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at /pass.php:70) in /pass.php on line 77