Cyber Monday 2024! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions

Fortinet Exam NSE8_812 Topic 3 Question 38 Discussion

Actual exam question for Fortinet's NSE8_812 exam
Question #: 38
Topic #: 3
[All NSE8_812 Questions]

Refer to the exhibit, which shows a Branch1 configuration and routing table.

In the SD-WAN implicit rule, you do not want the traffic load balance for the overlay interface when all members are available.

In this scenario, which configuration change will meet this requirement?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: D

The default load balancing mode for the SD-WAN implicit rule is source IP based. This means that traffic will be load balanced evenly between the overlay members, regardless of the member's priority.

To prevent traffic from being load balanced, you can configure the priority of each overlay member to 10. This will make the member ineligible for load balancing.

The other options are not correct. Changing the load balancing mode to source-IP based will still result in traffic being load balanced. Creating a new static route with the internet sdwan-zone only will not affect the load balancing of the overlay interface. Configuring the cost in each overlay member to 10 will also not affect the load balancing, as the cost is only used when the implicit rule cannot find a match for the destination IP address.


Contribute your Thoughts:

Brittni
2 days ago
Hmm, that makes sense too. It could ensure that the traffic load balance is not done when all members are available.
upvoted 0 times
...
Nathalie
3 days ago
I disagree, I believe the correct answer is D) Configure the priority in each overlay member to 10.
upvoted 0 times
...
Jesus
7 days ago
Haha, I bet the exam writer had a good chuckle coming up with these options. Option B is just plain silly, who would create a static route just for the internet zone?
upvoted 0 times
...
Carrol
10 days ago
Hmm, I'm not sure. Changing the load-balance-mode to source-ip-based seems like it could work, but I'm not 100% confident in that.
upvoted 0 times
...
Brittni
12 days ago
I think the answer is A) Change the load-balance-mode to source-ip-based.
upvoted 0 times
...
Aileen
19 days ago
D looks like the correct answer to me. Setting the priority to 10 will make the overlay members equally preferred, preventing load balancing.
upvoted 0 times
...
Iola
23 days ago
I think option C is the way to go. Configuring the cost to 10 for each overlay member will ensure equal load balancing.
upvoted 0 times
Jovita
2 days ago
True, it does seem like a more targeted solution compared to the other options.
upvoted 0 times
...
Tegan
5 days ago
I agree, option C seems like the best choice.
upvoted 0 times
...
Amalia
5 days ago
I think option C is more specific to the scenario described in the question.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lucy
11 days ago
But wouldn't changing the load-balance-mode to source-ip-based also work?
upvoted 0 times
...
Lourdes
19 days ago
I agree, option C seems like the best choice for equal load balancing.
upvoted 0 times
...
...

Save Cancel
az-700  pass4success  az-104  200-301  200-201  cissp  350-401  350-201  350-501  350-601  350-801  350-901  az-720  az-305  pl-300  

Warning: Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at /pass.php:70) in /pass.php on line 77