Refer to Exhibit:
A SOC analyst is creating the Malicious File Detected playbook to run when FortiAnalyzer generates a malicious file event. The playbook must also update the incident with the malicious file event data.
What must the next task in this playbook be?
Understanding the Playbook and its Components:
The exhibit shows a playbook in which an event trigger starts actions upon detecting a malicious file.
The initial tasks in the playbook include CREATE_INCIDENT and GET_EVENTS.
Analysis of Current Tasks:
EVENT_TRIGGER STARTER: This initiates the playbook when a specified event (malicious file detection) occurs.
CREATE_INCIDENT: This task likely creates a new incident in the incident management system for tracking and response.
GET_EVENTS: This task retrieves the event details related to the detected malicious file.
Objective of the Next Task:
The next logical step after creating an incident and retrieving event details is to update the incident with the event data, ensuring all relevant information is attached to the incident record.
This helps SOC analysts by consolidating all pertinent details within the incident record, facilitating efficient tracking and response.
Evaluating the Options:
Option A: Update Asset and Identity is not directly relevant to attaching event data to the incident.
Option B: Attach Data to Incident sounds plausible but typically, updating an incident involves more comprehensive changes including status updates, adding comments, and other data modifications.
Option C: Run Report is irrelevant in this context as the goal is to update the incident with event data.
Option D: Update Incident is the most suitable action for incorporating event data into the existing incident record.
Conclusion:
The next task in the playbook should be to update the incident with the event data to ensure the incident reflects all necessary information for further investigation and response.
Fortinet Documentation on Playbook Creation and Incident Management.
Best Practices for Automating Incident Response in SOC Operations.
Which two playbook triggers enable the use of trigger events in later tasks as trigger variables? (Choose two.)
Understanding Playbook Triggers:
Playbook triggers are the starting points for automated workflows within FortiAnalyzer or FortiSOAR.
These triggers determine how and when a playbook is executed and can pass relevant information (trigger variables) to subsequent tasks within the playbook.
Types of Playbook Triggers:
EVENT Trigger:
Initiates the playbook when a specific event occurs.
The event details can be used as variables in later tasks to customize the response.
Selected as it allows using event details as trigger variables.
INCIDENT Trigger:
Activates the playbook when an incident is created or updated.
The incident details are available as variables in subsequent tasks.
Selected as it enables the use of incident details as trigger variables.
ON SCHEDULE Trigger:
Executes the playbook at specified times or intervals.
Does not inherently use trigger events to pass variables to later tasks.
Not selected as it does not involve passing trigger event details.
ON DEMAND Trigger:
Runs the playbook manually or as required.
Does not automatically include trigger event details for use in later tasks.
Not selected as it does not use trigger events for variables.
Implementation Steps:
Step 1: Define the conditions for the EVENT or INCIDENT trigger in the playbook configuration.
Step 2: Use the details from the trigger event or incident in subsequent tasks to customize actions and responses.
Step 3: Test the playbook to ensure that the trigger variables are correctly passed and utilized.
Conclusion:
EVENT and INCIDENT triggers are specifically designed to initiate playbooks based on specific occurrences, allowing the use of trigger details in subsequent tasks.
Fortinet Documentation on Playbook Configuration FortiSOAR Playbook Guide
By using the EVENT and INCIDENT triggers, you can leverage trigger events in later tasks as variables, enabling more dynamic and responsive playbook actions.
Review the following incident report:
Attackers leveraged a phishing email campaign targeting your employees.
The email likely impersonated a trusted source, such as the IT department, and requested login credentials.
An unsuspecting employee clicked a malicious link in the email, leading to the download and execution of a Remote Access Trojan (RAT).
The RAT provided the attackers with remote access and a foothold in the compromised system.
Which two MITRE ATT&CK tactics does this incident report capture? (Choose two.)
Understanding the MITRE ATT&CK Tactics:
The MITRE ATT&CK framework categorizes various tactics and techniques used by adversaries to achieve their objectives.
Tactics represent the objectives of an attack, while techniques represent how those objectives are achieved.
Analyzing the Incident Report:
Phishing Email Campaign: This tactic is commonly used for gaining initial access to a system.
Malicious Link and RAT Download: Clicking a malicious link and downloading a RAT is indicative of establishing initial access.
Remote Access Trojan (RAT): Once installed, the RAT allows attackers to maintain access over an extended period, which is a persistence tactic.
Mapping to MITRE ATT&CK Tactics:
Initial Access:
This tactic covers techniques used to gain an initial foothold within a network.
Techniques include phishing and exploiting external remote services.
The phishing campaign and malicious link click fit this category.
Persistence:
This tactic includes methods that adversaries use to maintain their foothold.
Techniques include installing malware that can survive reboots and persist on the system.
The RAT provides persistent remote access, fitting this tactic.
Exclusions:
Defense Evasion:
This involves techniques to avoid detection and evade defenses.
While potentially relevant in a broader context, the incident report does not specifically describe actions taken to evade defenses.
Lateral Movement:
This involves moving through the network to other systems.
The report does not indicate actions beyond initial access and maintaining that access.
Conclusion:
The incident report captures the tactics of Initial Access and Persistence.
MITRE ATT&CK Framework documentation on Initial Access and Persistence tactics.
Incident analysis and mapping to MITRE ATT&CK tactics.
Refer to the exhibits.
You configured a custom event handler and an associated rule to generate events whenever FortiMail detects spam emails. However, you notice that the event handler is generating events for both spam emails and clean emails.
Which change must you make in the rule so that it detects only spam emails?
Understanding the Custom Event Handler Configuration:
The event handler is set up to generate events based on specific log data.
The goal is to generate events specifically for spam emails detected by FortiMail.
Analyzing the Issue:
The event handler is currently generating events for both spam emails and clean emails.
This indicates that the rule's filtering criteria are not correctly distinguishing between spam and non-spam emails.
Evaluating the Options:
Option A: Selecting the 'Anti-Spam Log (spam)' in the Log Type field will ensure that only logs related to spam emails are considered. This is the most straightforward and accurate way to filter for spam emails.
Option B: Typing type==spam in the Log filter by Text field might help filter the logs, but it is not as direct and reliable as selecting the correct log type.
Option C: Disabling the rule to use the filter in the data selector to create the event does not address the issue of filtering for spam logs specifically.
Option D: Selecting 'Within a group, the log field Spam Name (snane) has 2 or more unique values' is not directly relevant to filtering spam logs and could lead to incorrect filtering criteria.
Conclusion:
The correct change to make in the rule is to select 'Anti-Spam Log (spam)' in the Log Type field. This ensures that the event handler only generates events for spam emails.
Fortinet Documentation on Event Handlers and Log Types.
Best Practices for Configuring FortiMail Anti-Spam Settings.
Refer to the exhibits.
You configured a spearphishing event handler and the associated rule. However. FortiAnalyzer did not generate an event.
When you check the FortiAnalyzer log viewer, you confirm that FortiSandbox forwarded the appropriate logs, as shown in the raw log exhibit.
What configuration must you change on FortiAnalyzer in order for FortiAnalyzer to generate an event?
Understanding the Event Handler Configuration:
The event handler is set up to detect specific security incidents, such as spearphishing, based on logs forwarded from other Fortinet products like FortiSandbox.
An event handler includes rules that define the conditions under which an event should be triggered.
Analyzing the Current Configuration:
The current event handler is named 'Spearphishing handler' with a rule titled 'Spearphishing Rule 1'.
The log viewer shows that logs are being forwarded by FortiSandbox but no events are generated by FortiAnalyzer.
Key Components of Event Handling:
Log Type: Determines which type of logs will trigger the event handler.
Data Selector: Specifies the criteria that logs must meet to trigger an event.
Automation Stitch: Optional actions that can be triggered when an event occurs.
Notifications: Defines how alerts are communicated when an event is detected.
Issue Identification:
Since FortiSandbox logs are correctly forwarded but no event is generated, the issue likely lies in the data selector configuration or log type matching.
The data selector must be configured to include logs forwarded by FortiSandbox.
Solution:
B . Configure a FortiSandbox data selector and add it to the event handler:
By configuring a data selector specifically for FortiSandbox logs and adding it to the event handler, FortiAnalyzer can accurately identify and trigger events based on the forwarded logs.
Steps to Implement the Solution:
Step 1: Go to the Event Handler settings in FortiAnalyzer.
Step 2: Add a new data selector that includes criteria matching the logs forwarded by FortiSandbox (e.g., log subtype, malware detection details).
Step 3: Link this data selector to the existing spearphishing event handler.
Step 4: Save the configuration and test to ensure events are now being generated.
Conclusion:
The correct configuration of a FortiSandbox data selector within the event handler ensures that FortiAnalyzer can generate events based on relevant logs.
Fortinet Documentation on Event Handlers and Data Selectors FortiAnalyzer Event Handlers
Fortinet Knowledge Base for Configuring Data Selectors FortiAnalyzer Data Selectors
By configuring a FortiSandbox data selector and adding it to the event handler, FortiAnalyzer will be able to accurately generate events based on the appropriate logs.
Arthur
21 days agoDarci
2 months agoCecilia
3 months agoMargart
3 months agoLorrine
4 months agoParis
4 months agoNovella
5 months agoLauryn
5 months agoOnita
5 months ago