You know, I'm just imagining a workflow engine that's like a robot butler, just tirelessly completing tasks without ever needing a coffee break. That would be pretty cool, but I'm still leaning towards 'False' on this one.
Hold up, are we sure we're not just talking about a very specific, limited workflow here? I mean, if it's something simple like processing invoices or approving time off requests, then yeah, a workflow engine could probably handle that. But for anything more complex, I'd say 'False'.
I'm feeling pretty confident about this one. Workflow engines are designed to automate repeatable processes, and they can definitely complete those without human interaction. I'm going with 'True'.
Hmm, I'm not so sure. Maybe it depends on the specific workflow engine and the complexity of the process. I could see a highly sophisticated system being able to handle a lot without human input. But I'd still err on the side of caution and go with 'False'.
Yeah, I agree. Workflow engines are powerful, but they're not omniscient. There are always going to be edge cases or exceptions that require a human touch. I'm going with 'False' on this one.
I think this question is a bit tricky. Workflow engines can automate certain processes, but I don't think they can complete all processes without any human interaction. There's usually some level of oversight or intervention required at some point.
upvoted 0 times
...
Log in to Pass4Success
Sign in:
Report Comment
Is the comment made by USERNAME spam or abusive?
Commenting
In order to participate in the comments you need to be logged-in.
You can sign-up or
login
Sabine
7 months agoNobuko
7 months agoKatie
7 months agoMarva
7 months agoCornell
7 months agoPatti
7 months agoCarla
8 months agoAnnelle
7 months agoMichal
7 months agoSarah
8 months agoTwana
8 months agoCatherin
8 months agoMickie
8 months agoJaney
8 months ago