Cyber Monday 2024! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25

- Free Preparation Discussions

GAQM Exam CBAF-001 Topic 3 Question 55 Discussion

Actual exam question for GAQM's CBAF-001 exam

Question #: 55
Topic #: 3

[All CBAF-001 Questions]

A business analyst wishes to show that a company wants to store information about different types of product. Some attributes are common to every product (for example; product name) but other attributes only apply to certain product types. For example, product material only applies to accessory products. Which of the following constructs could the business analyst use to represent this on a class model?

AAn association class.

BA many-to-many multiplicity.

CA generalization structure.

DAn <<extend>> structure.

Show Suggested Answer

Suggested Answer: C

by Herminia at Sep 11, 2024, 07:03 PM

Limited Time Offer

25%

Off

Get Premium CBAF-001 Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF

Contribute your Thoughts:

Submit Cancel

Halina

2 months ago

I think a many-to-many multiplicity could work too, depending on the specific requirements.

upvoted 0 times

...

Kanisha

2 months ago

Hold on, what if the products are completely unrelated and we need to use an association class to link them? I'm going to have to think this one through.

upvoted 0 times

Elfrieda

1 months ago

Maybe we can use a generalization structure to represent that on the class model.

upvoted 0 times

...

Madelyn

2 months ago

That could work, but what if we need to show that certain attributes only apply to specific product types?

upvoted 0 times

...

Sylvia

2 months ago

I think we can use an association class to link the unrelated products.

upvoted 0 times

...

...

Ludivina

3 months ago

I believe an association class could also be used to represent this information.

upvoted 0 times

...

Jeanice

3 months ago

Haha, I bet the exam writers are trying to trip us up with those other options. Nice try, but I'm sticking with C!

upvoted 0 times

Mickie

1 months ago

I agree with you, C seems like the safest choice.

upvoted 0 times

...

Buffy

2 months ago

I'm going with B, it seems like the most logical option.

upvoted 0 times

...

Lashawnda

2 months ago

I'm not so sure, I think A might be the correct answer.

upvoted 0 times

...

Reed

2 months ago

I think C is the best choice too.

upvoted 0 times

...

...

Glendora

3 months ago

Hmm, I'm not sure about the <> structure here. Isn't that more for use case extensions rather than data modeling?

upvoted 0 times

...

Shantell

3 months ago

I agree with Hector, a generalization structure makes sense for this scenario.

upvoted 0 times

...

Tomas

3 months ago

I agree, a generalization structure would be a clean way to model the product hierarchy and inherit the appropriate attributes.

upvoted 0 times

...

Weldon

3 months ago

C) A generalization structure seems like the best approach to represent the different product types and their common/unique attributes.

upvoted 0 times

Karrie

3 months ago

B: Yeah, that makes sense. It would help show the common and unique attributes for each type of product.

upvoted 0 times

...

Madalyn

3 months ago

A: I think a generalization structure would be the best way to represent the different product types.

upvoted 0 times

...

...

Hector

3 months ago

I think the business analyst could use a generalization structure.

upvoted 0 times

...

az-700 pass4success az-104 200-301 200-201 cissp 350-401 350-201 350-501 350-601 350-801 350-901 az-720 az-305 pl-300

Warning: Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at /pass.php:70) in /pass.php on line 77