Cyber Monday 2024! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions

GAQM Exam CLSSGB-001 Topic 9 Question 64 Discussion

Actual exam question for GAQM's CLSSGB-001 exam
Question #: 64
Topic #: 9
[All CLSSGB-001 Questions]

The reported Cpk for a process with an average of 94 units, a spread of 22 units and upper and lower specification limits of 125 and 80 units would be?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: B

Contribute your Thoughts:

Salome
25 days ago
Okay, let's see... Cpk, Cpk, where have I heard that before? Oh, right, it's all about process capability! Hmm, I'm gonna go with option B, 1.27. Sounds about right to me.
upvoted 0 times
...
Jodi
28 days ago
Cpk, huh? That's easy, it's just like measuring the width of a basketball hoop. Wait, no, that's a different sports analogy. Let me think about this one again...
upvoted 0 times
Chantell
1 days ago
B) 1.27
upvoted 0 times
...
Ellsworth
8 days ago
A) 0.64
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Walton
1 months ago
Ooh, a Cpk question! This is my jam. Hang on, let me grab my calculator and work this out step-by-step. Gotta love a good statistical analysis problem, am I right?
upvoted 0 times
Carissa
9 days ago
C) 1.84
upvoted 0 times
...
Beth
15 days ago
B) 1.27
upvoted 0 times
...
Jenelle
26 days ago
A) 0.64
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Weldon
1 months ago
Alright, let's do this! Cpk is all about process capability, so we need to crunch those numbers. I'm feeling option C, 1.84, but let's see what the others think.
upvoted 0 times
Ty
8 days ago
I also think it's option C, 1.84.
upvoted 0 times
...
Denny
14 days ago
I'm leaning towards option D, 2.12.
upvoted 0 times
...
Jacinta
16 days ago
I agree with option C, 1.84.
upvoted 0 times
...
Justine
19 days ago
I think it's option B, 1.27.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Leontine
1 months ago
I agree with Frederic, because the Cpk value should be greater than 1 for a process to be considered capable.
upvoted 0 times
...
Charlesetta
2 months ago
Hmm, gotta remember the Cpk formula. Let's see, it's something like (Upper Spec Limit - Lower Spec Limit) / (6 * Standard Deviation), right? Wait, is that even the right formula? I need to brush up on my Six Sigma knowledge.
upvoted 0 times
Kimbery
7 days ago
D) 2.12
upvoted 0 times
...
Julieta
14 days ago
C) 1.84
upvoted 0 times
...
Alison
26 days ago
B) 1.27
upvoted 0 times
...
Jarvis
1 months ago
A) 0.64
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Frederic
2 months ago
I think the answer is B) 1.27.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel
az-700  pass4success  az-104  200-301  200-201  cissp  350-401  350-201  350-501  350-601  350-801  350-901  az-720  az-305  pl-300  

Warning: Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at /pass.php:70) in /pass.php on line 77