Cyber Monday 2024! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions

Genesys Exam GE0-807 Topic 9 Question 79 Discussion

Actual exam question for Genesys's GE0-807 exam
Question #: 79
Topic #: 9
[All GE0-807 Questions]

When comparing the network bandwidth and performance (jitter, packet loss, latency) between G.711 and 6.729 codes, which one of the statements is true?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: B

Contribute your Thoughts:

Karol
2 months ago
Wow, G.729 is like the compact car of the audio codec world - smaller, but still gets you where you need to go. I'll remember that one.
upvoted 0 times
Nieves
24 days ago
It's amazing how technology can make things smaller and more efficient!
upvoted 0 times
...
Truman
25 days ago
G) 711, with a sample size of 64kbit/s, achieves a maximum MOS of 4.1, whereas G.729, with a much smaller sample size of 8kbit/s, can achieve a MOS of 3.9. G.729 is 'compressed eight times smaller than G.711 while sounding almost as good.'
upvoted 0 times
...
Tamesha
29 days ago
That's right, G.729 is more efficient in terms of bandwidth usage.
upvoted 0 times
...
Barrett
1 months ago
B) G.729 requires less bandwidth than G.711, but G.711 requires better network performance
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Rosalind
2 months ago
Option G is quite informative. G.711 may have a higher MOS, but G.729 packs a lot of quality in a smaller footprint. I'll keep that in mind.
upvoted 0 times
Laticia
2 months ago
That's interesting. So G.729 is more efficient in terms of bandwidth, but it needs better network performance. Good to know!
upvoted 0 times
...
Derrick
2 months ago
G.729 requires less bandwidth than G.711, but G.729 requires better network performance
upvoted 0 times
...
Rebbecca
2 months ago
Option G is quite informative. G.711 may have a higher MOS, but G.729 packs a lot of quality in a smaller footprint. I'll keep that in mind.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Fletcher
3 months ago
Interesting point, but I still think B) is the correct answer based on the comparison of network performance between G.711 and G.729.
upvoted 0 times
...
Louisa
3 months ago
I agree with Mari. G.729 is more bandwidth-efficient but needs a better network to perform well.
upvoted 0 times
...
Mari
3 months ago
Option D is the correct answer. G.729 requires less bandwidth but has stricter network performance requirements than G.711.
upvoted 0 times
Willetta
2 months ago
Yes, that's correct. G.729 requires less bandwidth but better network performance.
upvoted 0 times
...
Melissia
2 months ago
So, G.729 requires better network performance compared to G.711, right?
upvoted 0 times
...
Genevive
2 months ago
That makes sense. G.729 is compressed eight times smaller than G.711 while still sounding almost as good.
upvoted 0 times
...
Margery
2 months ago
I think option D is the correct answer. G.729 requires less bandwidth but has stricter network performance requirements than G.711.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Lashunda
3 months ago
I disagree, I believe the answer is D) G.729 requires less bandwidth than G.711, but G.729 requires better network performance.
upvoted 0 times
...
Fletcher
3 months ago
I think the answer is B) G.729 requires less bandwidth than G.711, but G.711 requires better network performance.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel
az-700  pass4success  az-104  200-301  200-201  cissp  350-401  350-201  350-501  350-601  350-801  350-901  az-720  az-305  pl-300  

Warning: Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at /pass.php:70) in /pass.php on line 77