While maintaining the gist history, which of the following is the most efficient way to create a public gist based on another user's gist?
Forking a gist is the most efficient way to create a public gist based on another user's gist while maintaining the history of the original gist. When you fork a gist, you create a new gist in your own account that retains a link to the original, allowing you to track changes and contribute back if desired.
Forking a Gist:
Option A is correct because forking is a straightforward way to create your own copy of another user's gist while preserving the history and making it easy to track updates.
Incorrect Options:
Option B is incorrect because creating a new gist and copying the content would not preserve the history or link back to the original gist.
Option C is incorrect because cloning is typically associated with repositories, not gists, and is more complex than forking for this purpose.
Option D is incorrect because requesting to be added to the existing gist is not a standard GitHub feature.
Regenia
2 months agoCherry
2 months agoAgustin
1 months agoVal
1 months agoDaron
2 months agoJacki
2 months agoAudrie
2 months agoReita
28 days agoElly
1 months agoTawanna
1 months agoMarylin
2 months agoHillary
3 months agoTamar
1 months agoJeannine
2 months agoVeronika
2 months agoPearly
3 months agoTommy
2 months agoSang
2 months agoTheron
2 months agoCherilyn
2 months agoVanesa
3 months agoTanja
3 months agoAlana
2 months agoFranklyn
3 months ago