Deal of The Day! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions

Google Exam Professional-Cloud-Architect Topic 5 Question 77 Discussion

Actual exam question for Google's Google Cloud Architect Professional exam
Question #: 77
Topic #: 5
[All Google Cloud Architect Professional Questions]

Your company wants to migrate their 10-TB on-premises database export into Cloud Storage You want to minimize the time it takes to complete this activity, the overall cost and database load The bandwidth between the on-premises environment and Google Cloud is 1 Gbps You want to follow Google-recommended practices What should you do?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: A

The Data Transfer appliance is a Google-provided hardware device that can be used to transfer large amounts of data from on-premises environments to Cloud Storage. It is suitable for scenarios where the bandwidth between the on-premises environment and Google Cloud is low or insufficient, and the data size is large. The Data Transfer appliance can minimize the time it takes to complete the migration, the overall cost and database load, by avoiding network bottlenecks and reducing bandwidth consumption. The Data Transfer appliance also encrypts the data at rest and in transit, ensuring data security and privacy. The other options are not optimal for this scenario, because they either require a high-bandwidth network connection (B, C, D), or incur additional costs and complexity (B, C). Reference:

https://cloud.google.com/data-transfer-appliance/docs/overview

https://cloud.google.com/blog/products/storage-data-transfer/introducing-storage-transfer-service-for-on-premises-data


Contribute your Thoughts:

Gregoria
4 months ago
I see your point, but Dataflow job in option C might still be more cost-effective.
upvoted 0 times
...
Margot
4 months ago
I think option D could be a good choice to consider for faster upload.
upvoted 0 times
...
Dick
5 months ago
But wouldn't using Data Transfer appliance offline migration be faster?
upvoted 0 times
...
Gregoria
5 months ago
I disagree, I believe option C would be more efficient.
upvoted 0 times
...
Dick
5 months ago
I think option A is the best choice.
upvoted 0 times
...
Matthew
6 months ago
I'm not a fan of the Data Transfer appliance either. It's probably more suitable for larger migrations. The Dataflow job sounds like the way to go, but I wonder if it might be overkill for a 10-TB database. Hmm, decisions, decisions...
upvoted 0 times
...
France
6 months ago
The compressed gsutil -m upload seems like a good compromise between cost and speed. It's a simple solution that takes advantage of the 1 Gbps bandwidth, and the multi-threaded copy should help move the data quickly.
upvoted 0 times
...
Augustine
6 months ago
I'm leaning towards the Dataflow job option. It seems like the most cost-effective and efficient way to move the data directly from the database to Cloud Storage. Plus, it follows the Google-recommended practices.
upvoted 0 times
Launa
5 months ago
I'm leaning towards the Dataflow job option. It seems like the most cost-effective and efficient way to move the data directly from the database to Cloud Storage. Plus, it follows the Google-recommended practices.
upvoted 0 times
...
Markus
6 months ago
D) Compress the data and upload it with gsutil -m to enable multi-threaded copy
upvoted 0 times
...
Fatima
6 months ago
C) Develop a Dataflow job to read data directly from the database and write it into Cloud Storage
upvoted 0 times
...
Verlene
6 months ago
B) Use a commercial partner ETL solution to extract the data from the on-premises database and upload it into Cloud Storage
upvoted 0 times
...
Rodney
6 months ago
A) Use the Data Transfer appliance to perform an offline migration
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Germaine
6 months ago
This is a tricky question. I'm not sure if the Data Transfer appliance is the best option since it might be overkill for a 10-TB migration. The commercial partner ETL solution could work, but it might be more expensive than the other options.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel
az-700  pass4success  az-104  200-301  200-201  cissp  350-401  350-201  350-501  350-601  350-801  350-901  az-720  az-305  pl-300  

Warning: Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at /pass.php:70) in /pass.php on line 77