Cyber Monday 2024! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions

Google Exam Professional Cloud Network Engineer Topic 2 Question 93 Discussion

Actual exam question for Google's Professional Cloud Network Engineer exam
Question #: 93
Topic #: 2
[All Professional Cloud Network Engineer Questions]

You are designing an IP address scheme for new private Google Kubernetes Engine (GKE) clusters. Due to IP address exhaustion of the RFC 1918 address space In your enterprise, you plan to use privately used public IP space for the new clusters. You want to follow Google-recommended practices. What should you do after designing your IP scheme?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: D

This answer follows the Google-recommended practices for using privately used public IP (PUPI) addresses for GKE Pod address blocks1. The benefits of this approach are:

It allows you to use any public IP addresses that are not owned by Google or your organization for your Pods, which can help mitigate address exhaustion in your enterprise.

It prevents any external traffic from reaching your Pods, as Google Cloud does not route PUPI addresses to the internet or to other VPC networks by default.

It enables you to use VPC Network Peering to connect your GKE cluster to other VPC networks that use different PUPI addresses, as long as you enable the export and import of custom routes for the peering connection.

It preserves the fully integrated network model of GKE, where Pods can communicate with nodes and other resources in the same VPC network without NAT.

The options that you need to select when creating a private GKE cluster with PUPI addresses are:

--disable-default-snat: This option disables source NAT for outbound traffic from Pods to destinations outside the cluster's VPC network.This is necessary to prevent Pods from using RFC 1918 addresses as their source IP addresses, which could cause conflicts with other networks that use the same address space2.

--enable-ip-alias: This option enables alias IP ranges for Pods and Services, which allows you to use separate subnet ranges for them.This is required to use PUPI addresses for Pods1.

--enable-private-nodes: This option creates a private cluster, where nodes do not have external IP addresses and can only communicate with the control plane through a private endpoint.This enhances the security and privacy of your cluster3.

Option A is incorrect because it does not use PUPI addresses for Pods, but rather RFC 1918 addresses. This does not solve the problem of address exhaustion in your enterprise. Option B is incorrect because it reuses the secondary address range for Services across multiple private GKE clusters, which could cause IP conflicts and routing issues. Option C is incorrect because it does not specify the options that are needed to create a private GKE cluster with PUPI addresses.

1:Configuring privately used public IPs for GKE | Kubernetes Engine | Google Cloud2:Using Cloud NAT with GKE | Kubernetes Engine | Google Cloud3:Private clusters | Kubernetes Engine | Google Cloud


Contribute your Thoughts:

Claribel
2 months ago
I'm not sure, I think option A could also work. Re-using the secondary address range for the pods might be a good way to optimize resources.
upvoted 0 times
...
Keena
2 months ago
I agree with Dawne. Option D seems to be the most secure and efficient way to design the IP address scheme for the new GKE clusters.
upvoted 0 times
...
France
3 months ago
Option D all the way! Can't go wrong with that one. Although, I did hear a rumor that the Google engineer who came up with this recommendation was a secret comedian. Guess they have a sense of humor too.
upvoted 0 times
...
Franchesca
3 months ago
Hmm, I was going with Option C, but Option D sounds like the better choice. Gotta follow those Google recommendations, you know.
upvoted 0 times
Juan
1 months ago
Great choice! Option D it is for our IP address scheme.
upvoted 0 times
...
Alison
1 months ago
I'm leaning towards Option D as well. Let's follow Google's recommendations.
upvoted 0 times
...
Melinda
2 months ago
Yeah, it's important to follow the recommended practices to ensure the security and efficiency of the new clusters.
upvoted 0 times
...
Reena
2 months ago
Yeah, I agree. Google knows best, so let's go with Option D.
upvoted 0 times
...
Rebbeca
2 months ago
I agree, Option D with those specific options selected seems to align with best practices.
upvoted 0 times
...
Roselle
2 months ago
Option C sounds good, but I think Option D is the way to go.
upvoted 0 times
...
Jin
2 months ago
Option C seems like a good choice, but I think Option D is better for following Google's recommendations.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Dawne
3 months ago
I think option D is the best choice. It follows Google-recommended practices and ensures the security of the clusters.
upvoted 0 times
...
Carman
3 months ago
Option D is the way to go. Using publicly used private IP space and enabling IP Alias and disabling default SNAT is the Google-recommended practice for private GKE clusters.
upvoted 0 times
Freida
2 months ago
Option D is the way to go. Using publicly used private IP space and enabling IP Alias and disabling default SNAT is the Google-recommended practice for private GKE clusters.
upvoted 0 times
...
Ashlyn
2 months ago
That makes sense. It's important to follow the recommended practices for setting up the IP scheme for the new clusters.
upvoted 0 times
...
...

Save Cancel
az-700  pass4success  az-104  200-301  200-201  cissp  350-401  350-201  350-501  350-601  350-801  350-901  az-720  az-305  pl-300  

Warning: Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at /pass.php:70) in /pass.php on line 77