Cyber Monday 2024! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions

Google Exam Professional Cloud Network Engineer Topic 4 Question 91 Discussion

Actual exam question for Google's Professional Cloud Network Engineer exam
Question #: 91
Topic #: 4
[All Professional Cloud Network Engineer Questions]

You are designing a packet mirroring policy as pan of your network security architecture for your gaming workload. Your Infrastructure is located in the us-west2 region and deployed across several zones: us-west2-

a. us-west2-b. and us-west2-c The Infrastructure Is running a web-based application on TCP ports 80 and 443 with other game servers that utilize the UDP protocol. You need to deploy packet mirroring policies and collector instances to monitor web application traffic while minimizing inter-zonal network egress costs.

Following Google-recommended practices, how should you deploy the packet mirroring policies and collector instances?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: D

Create Packet Mirroring Policies:

You need to create three packet mirroring policies, one for each zone (us-west2-a, us-west2-b, and us-west2-c). This ensures that each zone's traffic is mirrored appropriately without unnecessary cross-zone traffic.

Create Collector Instances:

Set up one group of collector instances for the us-west2 region. Having a single group of collector instances for the entire region minimizes the number of instances required and simplifies the management while keeping egress costs low since the collectors are within the same region.

Configuration of Policies:

Each packet mirroring policy should be configured to match traffic for its specific zone. Use instance-tags to identify and match the relevant instances within each zone. This helps in correctly capturing the traffic from the appropriate sources.

Filter for TCP Traffic:

Create a filter for TCP traffic (ports 80 and 443). This step ensures that only the relevant web application traffic is mirrored, reducing the amount of data processed and improving efficiency.

Cost Efficiency:

By having packet mirroring policies specific to each zone and a regional collector group, you reduce inter-zonal network egress costs. The data remains within the same region, avoiding extra charges associated with cross-zone traffic.


Google Cloud Packet Mirroring Documentation

Best Practices for Packet Mirroring

Cost Management in Google Cloud

This solution aligns with Google-recommended practices by ensuring efficient traffic capture, minimal inter-zonal costs, and streamlined management of the packet mirroring setup.

Contribute your Thoughts:

Van
2 months ago
Hmm, maybe I should reconsider my choice then.
upvoted 0 times
...
Gwenn
2 months ago
I agree with Gilbert, A seems to be the most logical choice.
upvoted 0 times
...
Olene
2 months ago
Option B seems a bit overkill with the separate policies and collectors for each zone. Unless there are specific requirements to segregate the traffic, I'd lean towards Option C.
upvoted 0 times
...
Gilbert
2 months ago
But A seems to be following Google-recommended practices.
upvoted 0 times
...
Margarita
2 months ago
Hah, these cloud networking questions can really make your head spin sometimes. I'd probably go with Option C - keep it simple, stupid, right?
upvoted 0 times
Elke
1 months ago
Definitely. Option C minimizes complexity and still gets the job done.
upvoted 0 times
...
Wade
2 months ago
I think Option C makes sense too. Less room for error that way.
upvoted 0 times
...
Cordelia
2 months ago
Yeah, I agree. Keeping it simple is usually the best approach.
upvoted 0 times
...
Reuben
2 months ago
Option C seems like the most straightforward choice.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Stephanie
3 months ago
Hmm, Option D looks good. Separating the policies by zone will give more visibility, and having a single collector group is a smart way to keep costs down.
upvoted 0 times
...
Dino
3 months ago
I like the efficiency of Option C, but I'm concerned about the ability to differentiate between the zones. Perhaps Option D would provide more granular control while still keeping the collector instances centralized.
upvoted 0 times
Loren
1 months ago
That's true, Option D might be a better choice for granular control while still keeping collector instances centralized.
upvoted 0 times
...
Stacey
2 months ago
I agree, but Option D could offer more control over traffic in each specific zone.
upvoted 0 times
...
Angelyn
2 months ago
Option C seems like a good choice for centralized monitoring of web server traffic.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Kent
3 months ago
Option C seems the most straightforward. One policy and one group of collector instances for the whole region should be sufficient to monitor the web traffic while minimizing costs.
upvoted 0 times
Taryn
2 months ago
I agree, having one policy for the entire region simplifies management and reduces complexity.
upvoted 0 times
...
Melvin
3 months ago
Option C seems the most straightforward. One policy and one group of collector instances for the whole region should be sufficient to monitor the web traffic while minimizing costs.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Van
3 months ago
I disagree, I believe the answer is C.
upvoted 0 times
...
Gilbert
3 months ago
I think the answer is A.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel
az-700  pass4success  az-104  200-301  200-201  cissp  350-401  350-201  350-501  350-601  350-801  350-901  az-720  az-305  pl-300  

Warning: Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at /pass.php:70) in /pass.php on line 77