Cyber Monday 2024! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions

Google Exam Professional Cloud Network Engineer Topic 5 Question 96 Discussion

Actual exam question for Google's Professional Cloud Network Engineer exam
Question #: 96
Topic #: 5
[All Professional Cloud Network Engineer Questions]

You are designing an IP address scheme for new private Google Kubernetes Engine (GKE) clusters, Due to IP address exhaustion of the RFC 1918 address space in your enterprise, you plan to use privately used public IP space for the new dusters. You want to follow Google-recommended practices, What should you do after designing your IP scheme?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: D

The correct answer is D. Create privately used public IP primary and secondary subnet ranges for the clusters. Create a private GKE cluster with the following options selected: --disable-default-snat, --enable-ip-alias, and --enable-private-nodes.

This answer is based on the following facts:

Privately used public IP (PUPI) addresses are any public IP addresses not owned by Google that a customer can use privately on Google Cloud1. You can use PUPI addresses for GKE pods and services in private clusters to mitigate address exhaustion.

A private GKE cluster is a cluster that has no public IP addresses on the nodes2. You can use private clusters to isolate your workloads from the public internet and enhance security.

The --disable-default-snat option disables source network address translation (SNAT) for the cluster3. This option allows you to use PUPI addresses without conflicting with other public IP addresses on the internet.

The --enable-ip-alias option enables alias IP ranges for the cluster4. This option allows you to use separate subnet ranges for nodes, pods, and services, and to specify the size of those ranges.

The --enable-private-nodes option enables private nodes for the cluster5. This option ensures that the nodes have no public IP addresses and can only communicate with other Google Cloud resources in the same VPC network or peered networks.

The other options are not correct because:

Option A is not suitable. Creating RFC 1918 primary and secondary subnet IP ranges for the clusters does not solve the problem of address exhaustion. Re-using the secondary address range for pods across multiple private GKE clusters can cause IP conflicts and routing issues.

Option B is also not suitable. Creating RFC 1918 primary and secondary subnet IP ranges for the clusters does not solve the problem of address exhaustion. Re-using the secondary address range for services across multiple private GKE clusters can cause IP conflicts and routing issues.

Option C is not feasible. Creating privately used public IP primary and secondary subnet ranges for the clusters is a valid step, but creating a private GKE cluster with only --enable-ip-alias and --enable-private-nodes options is not enough. You also need to disable default SNAT to avoid IP conflicts with other public IP addresses on the internet.


Contribute your Thoughts:

Rosann
2 months ago
Option D, hands down. I'm just glad I don't have to worry about IP exhaustion in my personal life. Imagine running out of IP addresses for your toaster or something.
upvoted 0 times
...
Eun
2 months ago
I hope the exam doesn't ask us to design the actual IP scheme. That sounds like a headache! Option D is probably the best choice to avoid any IP address nightmares.
upvoted 0 times
...
Rosio
2 months ago
As a Google-recommended practice, Option D definitely seems like the way to go. Can't go wrong with disabling default SNAT and enabling IP aliasing.
upvoted 0 times
Coral
22 days ago
Creating privately used public IP ranges and selecting specific options for the private GKE cluster is the best approach.
upvoted 0 times
...
Krissy
1 months ago
I agree, following Google-recommended practices is important for setting up private GKE clusters.
upvoted 0 times
...
Hyman
1 months ago
Option D definitely seems like the way to go. Can't go wrong with disabling default SNAT and enabling IP aliasing.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Cathern
2 months ago
Hmm, I'm not too sure about reusing the secondary address range for services across multiple clusters. Seems like that could lead to potential conflicts. Option D seems safer.
upvoted 0 times
Deeanna
1 months ago
It's important to follow Google-recommended practices to ensure smooth operation of the GKE clusters.
upvoted 0 times
...
Candra
1 months ago
Option D does seem like the safer choice with the specified options selected.
upvoted 0 times
...
Pearly
1 months ago
I agree, reusing the secondary address range for services could cause conflicts.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Micah
3 months ago
Option D looks like the way to go. Using privately used public IP space and disabling default SNAT seems to be the recommended approach for this scenario.
upvoted 0 times
Yaeko
1 months ago
Creating a private GKE cluster with the specified options will help ensure efficient use of IP space and maintain network security.
upvoted 0 times
...
Erasmo
2 months ago
I agree, it's important to follow Google-recommended practices when designing IP address schemes for GKE clusters.
upvoted 0 times
...
Glory
2 months ago
Option D looks like the way to go. Using privately used public IP space and disabling default SNAT seems to be the recommended approach for this scenario.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Bobbye
3 months ago
I prefer option D because enabling IP alias and private nodes can provide better security and isolation for the clusters.
upvoted 0 times
...
Ashley
3 months ago
I agree with Hailey, option A seems like the most efficient way to manage IP addresses in the new GKE clusters.
upvoted 0 times
...
Hailey
3 months ago
I think option A is the best choice because re-using the secondary address range for pods across multiple clusters can help optimize IP address usage.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel
az-700  pass4success  az-104  200-301  200-201  cissp  350-401  350-201  350-501  350-601  350-801  350-901  az-720  az-305  pl-300  

Warning: Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at /pass.php:70) in /pass.php on line 77