Cyber Monday 2024! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions

Google Exam Professional Cloud Network Engineer Topic 7 Question 89 Discussion

Actual exam question for Google's Professional Cloud Network Engineer exam
Question #: 89
Topic #: 7
[All Professional Cloud Network Engineer Questions]

Your company is planning a migration to Google Kubernetes Engine. Your application team informed you that they require a minimum of 60 Pods per node and a maximum of 100 Pods per node Which Pod per node CIDR range should you use?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: B

To determine the Pod per node CIDR range, you need to calculate how many IP addresses are required for each node, and then choose the smallest CIDR range that can accommodate that number. A CIDR range of /n means that there are 2^(32-n) IP addresses available in that range. For example, a /24 range has 2^(32-24) = 256 IP addresses.

According to the question, the application team requires a minimum of 60 Pods per node and a maximum of 100 Pods per node. Therefore, you need to choose a CIDR range that can provide at least 100 IP addresses per node, but not more than necessary. A /25 range has 2^(32-25) = 128 IP addresses, which is enough for 100 Pods per node. A /26 range has 2^(32-26) = 64 IP addresses, which is not enough for 60 Pods per node. A /24 range has 256 IP addresses, which is more than needed and wastes IP address space. A /28 range has 2^(32-28) = 16 IP addresses, which is far too small for any node.

Therefore, the best option is B. /25.This is also consistent with the Google Kubernetes Engine documentation, which states that each node is allocated a /24 range of IP addresses for Pods by default, but the maximum number of Pods per node is 1101. This means that there are approximately twice as many available IP addresses as possible Pods, which is similar to the ratio of 128 to 100 in the /25 range.

1:Configure maximum Pods per node | Google Kubernetes Engine (GKE) | Google Cloud


Contribute your Thoughts:

Vanda
3 months ago
I'm feeling pretty confident about this one. Let's see, 60 to 100 Pods per node... I think the /26 CIDR range is the way to go. Gotta love those binary math skills!
upvoted 0 times
...
Jaime
3 months ago
Woah, 100 Pods per node? That's like a whole mini-Kubernetes cluster on a single node! I hope they've got some beefy hardware to handle that.
upvoted 0 times
Aleshia
3 months ago
B) /25
upvoted 0 times
...
Lavonna
3 months ago
B) /25
upvoted 0 times
...
Latanya
3 months ago
A) /24
upvoted 0 times
...
Flo
3 months ago
A) /24
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Nieves
3 months ago
This is a tricky one. I'm going to have to really think it through to make sure I get the right CIDR range. No room for error on this exam!
upvoted 0 times
...
Buddy
3 months ago
Hmm, I'm leaning towards /25 here. It seems like the best balance between the minimum and maximum Pods per node requirements.
upvoted 0 times
Kristeen
2 months ago
I agree with /25. It seems like the most balanced option for the Pods per node.
upvoted 0 times
...
Cordelia
2 months ago
I would go with /26. It provides a bit more flexibility while still meeting the requirements.
upvoted 0 times
...
Angelo
3 months ago
I think /25 is a good choice too. It meets the minimum and maximum requirements.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Nina
4 months ago
I think /28 could work too, as it would allow for more flexibility in managing the Pods per node.
upvoted 0 times
...
Ernie
4 months ago
Wait, so we need to have at least 60 Pods per node? That's a lot of Pods! I hope our nodes can handle all that traffic.
upvoted 0 times
Britt
3 months ago
C) /26
upvoted 0 times
...
Beth
3 months ago
B) /25
upvoted 0 times
...
Renea
3 months ago
A) /24
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Sharen
4 months ago
I agree with Mike, /26 would provide a good balance between the minimum and maximum Pods per node.
upvoted 0 times
...
Mike
4 months ago
I disagree, I believe /26 would be a better option to ensure we meet the requirements.
upvoted 0 times
...
Arlie
4 months ago
I think we should use /24 for the Pod per node CIDR range.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel
az-700  pass4success  az-104  200-301  200-201  cissp  350-401  350-201  350-501  350-601  350-801  350-901  az-720  az-305  pl-300  

Warning: Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at /pass.php:70) in /pass.php on line 77