Deal of The Day! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions

Google Exam Professional-Machine-Learning-Engineer Topic 5 Question 86 Discussion

Actual exam question for Google's Google Professional Machine Learning Engineer exam
Question #: 86
Topic #: 5
[All Google Professional Machine Learning Engineer Questions]

You work at an organization that maintains a cloud-based communication platform that integrates conventional chat, voice, and video conferencing into one platform. The audio recordings are stored in Cloud Storage. All recordings have an 8 kHz sample rate and are more than one minute long. You need to implement a new feature in the platform that will automatically transcribe voice call recordings into a text for future applications, such as call summarization and sentiment analysis. How should you implement the voice call transcription feature following Google-recommended best practices?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: D

Contribute your Thoughts:

Galen
1 days ago
I see your point, Alba. Let's go with the original rate for now.
upvoted 0 times
...
Erasmo
1 days ago
I'm with the crowd on this one. Option D is the way to go. Though I do wonder if the audio quality will be as good as a human transcriptionist. Maybe we should hire some really bored linguists instead?
upvoted 0 times
...
Alba
6 days ago
That's a good point, but I think using the original rate is more efficient.
upvoted 0 times
...
Reta
7 days ago
But wouldn't upsampling to 16 kHz improve the transcription accuracy?
upvoted 0 times
...
Margurite
7 days ago
Haha, I'm just imagining the poor interns having to listen to all those long, boring call recordings. Good thing they've got the Speech-to-Text API to do the dirty work!
upvoted 0 times
...
Galen
11 days ago
I agree with Alba, using the original rate seems like the best option.
upvoted 0 times
...
Curt
13 days ago
Option D all the way! 16 kHz audio and async recognition - that's the way to go. Gotta love those Google best practices, am I right?
upvoted 0 times
...
Lai
14 days ago
I agree with Antonio. The Google-recommended best practices suggest using asynchronous recognition for longer audio files, and upsampling to 16 kHz will improve the accuracy of the transcription.
upvoted 0 times
...
Antonio
18 days ago
Option D seems like the best choice here. Upsampling to 16 kHz and using asynchronous recognition will likely give us the best results for long audio recordings.
upvoted 0 times
Daniel
11 hours ago
Great, let's go with option D then. It seems like the most effective approach for implementing the voice call transcription feature.
upvoted 0 times
...
Carmen
6 days ago
I agree, using asynchronous recognition will also help with processing longer audio recordings more efficiently.
upvoted 0 times
...
Kirk
6 days ago
I think option D is the way to go. Upsampling to 16 kHz should improve the transcription accuracy.
upvoted 0 times
...
Blossom
14 days ago
I think option D is the way to go. Upsampling to 16 kHz should improve transcription accuracy.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Alba
26 days ago
I think we should use the original audio sampling rate for transcription.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel
az-700  pass4success  az-104  200-301  200-201  cissp  350-401  350-201  350-501  350-601  350-801  350-901  az-720  az-305  pl-300  

Warning: Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at /pass.php:70) in /pass.php on line 77