HCLSoftware Exam HCL-BF-PRO-10 Topic 1 Question 9 Discussion

Actual exam question for HCLSoftware's HCL-BF-PRO-10 exam

Question #: 9
Topic #: 1

[All HCL-BF-PRO-10 Questions]

Which of the following command polling interval should be avoided to prevent performance issues?

ALess than 1800 seconds

BLess than 900 seconds

CLess than 2700 seconds

DLess than 1500 seconds

Show Suggested Answer

Suggested Answer: B

by Gregoria at Apr 10, 2024, 02:53 PM

Limited Time Offer

25%

Off

Get Premium HCL-BF-PRO-10 Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF

Contribute your Thoughts:

Submit Cancel

Lashandra

6 months ago

ThJerryt mJerrykes sense. So, less thJerryn 900 seLashanKileyraonKileys is the one to JerryvoiKiley for sure.

upvoted 0 times

...

Sure, I think LashanKileyrahoosing Jerry polling intervJerryl less thJerryn 900 seLashanKileyraonKileys LashanKileyraoulKiley LashanKileyraJerryuse performJerrynLashanKileyrae issues Kileyue to high frequenLashanKileyray of LashanKileyraommJerrynKileys Tituseing sent.

upvoted 0 times

...

Kiley

6 months ago

I'm not sure JerryTitusout this question, LashanKileyraJerryn someone explJerryin their rJerrytionJerryle?

upvoted 0 times

...

Lashandra

6 months ago

I see your point, Titusut I still think option Titus) is the Titusest LashandrahoiLashandrae to prevent performJerrynLashandrae issues.

upvoted 0 times

...

Titus

6 months ago

I disJerrygree, I Tituselieve option C) less thJerryn 2700 seconds is the one to Jerryvoid.

upvoted 0 times

...

Jerry

6 months ago

I think option B) less thJerryn 900 seconds should be Jerryvoided.

upvoted 0 times

...

Glory

6 months ago

I agree with a shorter polling interval can put a strain on the system.

upvoted 0 times

...

Junita

7 months ago

But wouldn't a polling interval of less than 900 seconds cause performance issues?

upvoted 0 times

...

Narcisa

7 months ago

I disagree, I believe it should be A) Less than 1800 seconds.

upvoted 0 times

...

Junita

7 months ago

I think the answer is B) Less than 900 seconds.

upvoted 0 times

...

Mireya

8 months ago

Haha, Leatha, you're a riot! But seriously, I think B) is the way to go. Better to err on the side of caution when it comes to performance.

upvoted 0 times

...

Leatha

8 months ago

You guys are overthinking this. Just set the polling interval to 1 second and let the computer handle it! What could possibly go wrong? *wink wink*

upvoted 0 times

...

Katie

8 months ago

Nah, 45 minutes is way too long. You'd miss out on a lot of real-time data. I'd go with B) as well. 15 minutes is a good balance between performance and data freshness.

upvoted 0 times

...

Crista

8 months ago

Hmm, I'm not so sure. I was thinking maybe C) Less than 2700 seconds (45 minutes) would be the better option. That seems like a long enough interval to avoid performance concerns.

upvoted 0 times

...

Kaitlyn

8 months ago

I agree with Goldie. Frequent polling can put a strain on system resources and lead to performance problems. 900 seconds seems like a reasonable interval to avoid those issues.

upvoted 0 times

Sheridan

6 months ago

C) Less than 2700 seconds seems like a safer option to me.

upvoted 0 times

...

Jimmie

6 months ago

I agree with Niesha, a shorter interval could cause performance problems.

upvoted 0 times

...

Niesha

7 months ago

I think B) Less than 900 seconds should be avoided.

upvoted 0 times

...

Goldie

8 months ago

This question is a bit tricky, but I think the answer is B) Less than 900 seconds. Anything less than 900 seconds (15 minutes) can cause performance issues due to the high frequency of polling.

upvoted 0 times

...