Deal of The Day! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions

HP Exam HPE0-S60 Topic 1 Question 44 Discussion

Actual exam question for HP's HPE0-S60 exam
Question #: 44
Topic #: 1
[All HPE0-S60 Questions]

You modified a logical interconnect group mat is used to configure logical interconnects in five different logical enclosures. What will be the impact of that change?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: B, D

Contribute your Thoughts:

Mona
1 months ago
Option D sounds like the IT version of 'set it and forget it'. I'm not sure I trust that level of automation, but hey, maybe it'll save me a trip to the data center.
upvoted 0 times
Cherri
28 days ago
User 2: Yeah, I prefer to have more control over updates and changes.
upvoted 0 times
...
Giuseppe
30 days ago
User 1: Option D does sound pretty convenient, but I agree, automation can be risky.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Willow
2 months ago
I'm going to have to go with Option A. Putting the physical interconnects in maintenance mode seems like the safest approach, even if it's a bit inconvenient.
upvoted 0 times
Edward
15 days ago
User1: Definitely, we don't want any unexpected issues.
upvoted 0 times
...
Micaela
16 days ago
User2: Yeah, it's better to be safe than sorry.
upvoted 0 times
...
Dan
1 months ago
User1: I agree, putting them in maintenance mode is the safest option.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Katina
2 months ago
Option B seems the most straightforward. Rebooting the physical interconnects is a simple and reliable way to apply the new configuration. Though it might be a bit of a hassle.
upvoted 0 times
...
Malcolm
2 months ago
I'm leaning towards Option C. Inconsistency in logical interconnects is never a good thing, and it's better to be aware of it than to have it happen behind the scenes.
upvoted 0 times
Gertude
12 days ago
Good idea, we don't want any unexpected problems to arise.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lindsey
22 days ago
Maybe we should double-check the impact before making any changes.
upvoted 0 times
...
Yoko
1 months ago
I agree, inconsistency in logical interconnects can cause issues.
upvoted 0 times
...
Florencia
1 months ago
I think Option C is the safest choice.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Rory
2 months ago
But wouldn't it be better if all logical interconnects were automatically updated instead?
upvoted 0 times
...
Susana
2 months ago
Option D sounds like the most logical choice, but I'm a bit skeptical about 'automatically updated'. Seems too good to be true.
upvoted 0 times
Skye
20 days ago
User 4: We should proceed with caution then, just to be safe.
upvoted 0 times
...
Rebeca
23 days ago
User 3: It does sound too good to be true, maybe there's a catch.
upvoted 0 times
...
Marti
1 months ago
User 2: I agree, but I'm not sure about the 'automatically updated' part.
upvoted 0 times
...
Geraldo
1 months ago
User 1: I think option D is the best choice.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Carmelina
2 months ago
I agree, it could cause all logical interconnects configured with that group to report inconsistency.
upvoted 0 times
...
Nell
2 months ago
I think the impact of modifying the logical interconnect group will be significant.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel
az-700  pass4success  az-104  200-301  200-201  cissp  350-401  350-201  350-501  350-601  350-801  350-901  az-720  az-305  pl-300  

Warning: Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at /pass.php:70) in /pass.php on line 77