Cyber Monday 2024! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions

HP Exam HPE6-A69 Topic 1 Question 47 Discussion

Actual exam question for HP's HPE6-A69 exam
Question #: 47
Topic #: 1
[All HPE6-A69 Questions]

Company A and Company B are merging their BGP routed networks The companies have overlapping IP ranges and security concerns during the migration phase. Which Aruba CX 8325 functionality would help the merging of networks in a secure way?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: B

Contribute your Thoughts:

Mary
2 months ago
Haha, virtual route forwarding... Sounds like a spell from Harry Potter! But option D does seem like the most secure and efficient choice.
upvoted 0 times
Theodora
1 months ago
User 3: Definitely, using virtual route forwarding and BGP route leaking would help with the migration phase.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lacey
1 months ago
I agree, but option D does seem like the best choice for security.
upvoted 0 times
...
Shawnna
2 months ago
Haha, virtual route forwarding does sound like a spell!
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Tomoko
2 months ago
ACLs at the VLAN level? That's so 2010! I'd go with the more modern solution, option D.
upvoted 0 times
...
Audry
2 months ago
I'm not sure, but option C using vsf capable switch sounds like a good solution for network merging.
upvoted 0 times
...
Effie
2 months ago
B looks good to me. The Aruba Gateway appliance can provide the necessary control and security during the migration phase.
upvoted 0 times
Avery
1 months ago
I think using a vsf capable switch to integrate the routing would be the best option.
upvoted 0 times
...
Celia
1 months ago
I agree, but I think using the Aruba Gateway appliance would provide better control during the migration phase.
upvoted 0 times
...
Alton
2 months ago
I think we should use ACL's to separate the company networks at the VLAN level.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Oliva
2 months ago
I disagree, I believe option D with virtual route forwarding and BGP route leaking would provide better integration.
upvoted 0 times
...
Twana
3 months ago
I think option D is the way to go. Virtual route forwarding and BGP route leaking will allow the companies to securely merge their networks without any IP conflicts.
upvoted 0 times
Yolande
2 months ago
D) Use of virtual route forwarding and BGP route leaking
upvoted 0 times
...
Han
2 months ago
C) Use of vsf capable switch to integrate the routing
upvoted 0 times
...
Teddy
2 months ago
A) Use of ACL's to separate the company networks at the VLAN level
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Tresa
3 months ago
I think option A is the best choice for securing the networks during the merger.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel
az-700  pass4success  az-104  200-301  200-201  cissp  350-401  350-201  350-501  350-601  350-801  350-901  az-720  az-305  pl-300  

Warning: Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at /pass.php:70) in /pass.php on line 77