Cyber Monday 2024! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions

HP Exam HPE6-A69 Topic 2 Question 31 Discussion

Actual exam question for HP's HPE6-A69 exam
Question #: 31
Topic #: 2
[All HPE6-A69 Questions]

Refer to the exhibit.

A customer has implemented this ArubaOS-CX solution. NetEdit is not present. After a while, the secondary node of the VSX-cluster fails. What is the correct procedure to replace the failed node as quickly as possible?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: A

Contribute your Thoughts:

Stevie
6 months ago
Yeah, I think the priority is to get the VSX-cluster synchronized quickly.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lilli
6 months ago
But option C mentions booting up the new node in recovery mode, which seems faster.
upvoted 0 times
...
Dong
6 months ago
I disagree, I think option D is more efficient.
upvoted 0 times
...
Stevie
7 months ago
I agree with Lilli, option C seems like the best choice.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lilli
7 months ago
I think the correct procedure is option C.
upvoted 0 times
...
Grover
7 months ago
I agree. Option C seems to be the most logical choice for a quick replacement and successful synchronization of the VSX cluster.
upvoted 0 times
...
Benton
7 months ago
That makes sense. Option C seems like the right answer. It ensures that the VSX cluster will synchronize properly after the replacement.
upvoted 0 times
...
Mitsue
7 months ago
I think the correct procedure is to replace the failed unit, connect the correct cables, boot up the new node in recovery mode, upgrade firmware and restore config, then reboot.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel
az-700  pass4success  az-104  200-301  200-201  cissp  350-401  350-201  350-501  350-601  350-801  350-901  az-720  az-305  pl-300  

Warning: Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at /pass.php:70) in /pass.php on line 77