Cyber Monday 2024! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions
Mail Us support@pass4success.com
Location PL
Mob_nav_barsMENU

HP Exam HPE6-A69 Topic 2 Question 32 Discussion

Actual exam question for HP's HPE6-A69 exam
Question #: 32
Topic #: 2
[All HPE6-A69 Questions]

A customer wants to verify the proposed configuration snippets to create a point-to-point link between Aruba Switch and a third-party switch.

Will this configuration work with static routing?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: C

by Lavera at Apr 14, 2024, 03:27 AM

Limited Time Offer

25%

Off

Get Premium HPE6-A69 Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF

Contribute your Thoughts:

Submit Cancel
Rochell
5 months ago
I believe the MTU mismatch will cause IP communication issues, so the configuration won't work.
upvoted 0 times
...
Rupert
5 months ago
I also think the configuration will not work because the Aruba Switch is missing the 'routing' command.
upvoted 0 times
...
Kenneth
5 months ago
I disagree, the Aruba Switch needs a locally reachable IP address for the link to work.
upvoted 0 times
...
Fannie
5 months ago
I think the configuration will work because there seems to be no issues with it.
upvoted 0 times
...
Kent
5 months ago
That's a good point, Maybe the lack of the 'routing' command isn't a deal-breaker after all.
upvoted 0 times
...
Barb
6 months ago
But doesn't the fact that the Aruba Switch has a 'loopback1' IP address indicate that it has some kind of routing capability?
upvoted 0 times
...
Valentin
6 months ago
I agree with without the 'routing' command, the configuration might not function properly.
upvoted 0 times
...
Reid
7 months ago
I'm not so sure, I believe the Aruba Switch needs the 'routing' command for static routing to work.
upvoted 0 times
...
Barb
7 months ago
I think the configuration will work fine because all necessary commands seem to be included.
upvoted 0 times
...
Herminia
8 months ago
Haha, 'routing' command missing, that's a good one! These exam questions are always trying to trick you with little details like that. I bet that's the real issue here.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lenna
8 months ago
Guys, come on, this is a certification exam. They're not going to make it that easy. My money's on B - no locally reachable IP means no routing, period.
upvoted 0 times
Frederick
7 months ago
I don't think the MTU mismatch would be a big issue in this case. The lack of a locally reachable IP is the main problem.
upvoted 0 times
...
Mauricio
7 months ago
But what about the MTU mismatch mentioned in option A? Could that be a problem too?
upvoted 0 times
...
Helaine
7 months ago
I agree with B, without a locally reachable IP, routing won't work.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Leslie
8 months ago
You know, I bet the answer is D. The configuration looks pretty straightforward, and as long as the MTU and IP settings are compatible, static routing should just work. I mean, how hard can it be, right? *chuckles*
upvoted 0 times
...
Octavio
8 months ago
Hmm, I'm not so sure. The image shows the Aruba Switch has a gateway configured, so it should have a reachable IP address, right? Maybe the MTU mismatch is the real gotcha here.
upvoted 0 times
...
Skye
8 months ago
I think the lack of a 'routing' command on the Aruba Switch is the key problem. Without that, it won't be able to participate in the static routing, no matter what the other configs look like.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lili
8 months ago
This configuration question looks tricky. I'm not sure if the MTU mismatch or the lack of a locally reachable IP address on the Aruba Switch would be the real issue here.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel
az-700  pass4success  az-104  200-301  200-201  cissp  350-401  350-201  350-501  350-601  350-801  350-901  az-720  az-305  pl-300  

Warning: Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at /pass.php:70) in /pass.php on line 77