HP Exam HPE6-A69 Topic 3 Question 43 Discussion

Actual exam question for HP's HPE6-A69 exam

Question #: 43
Topic #: 3

The customer is already using Aruba Gateway and third-party L2 switches New ArubaOS CX 6300 switches have been deployed for R&D. which have a requirement for user profiling and tunneled traffic between ArubaOS CX 6300 and Aruba Gateway

What is required for this configuration to apply QoS user-based rules for the R&D client traffic?

AApply a QoS rule to the ArubaCX 6300 client port, lo classify traffic before it is tunneled.

BApply a port-access policy with QoS defined in the user role on the ArubaOS CX6300 switch

CManually prioritize IP protocol 47 traffic on the third-party switches to prioritize the tunneled traffic

DCreate a QoS policy for the UBT-client-VLAN traffic on the third-party switch.

Show Suggested Answer

Suggested Answer: A

by Glen at Aug 27, 2024, 09:59 PM

Limited Time Offer

25%

Off

Get Premium HPE6-A69 Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF

Contribute your Thoughts:

Submit Cancel

Elli

3 months ago

I believe option D is not the right choice, as creating a QoS policy on the third-party switch may not be effective for user-based rules.

upvoted 0 times

...

Jordan

3 months ago

I'm not sure, but I think option A could also work by applying a QoS rule to the ArubaCX 6300 client port.

upvoted 0 times

...

Donte

3 months ago

Hmm, I wonder if the third-party switches can even handle this kind of traffic prioritization. Might as well go with option B and let the ArubaOS CX 6300 do the heavy lifting.

upvoted 0 times

Lennie

2 months ago

Lorean: Definitely, better to be safe than sorry

upvoted 0 times

...

Lacey

2 months ago

Yeah, it's safer to go with the ArubaOS CX 6300 for user profiling and tunneled traffic

upvoted 0 times

...

Jesusita

2 months ago

I think option B is the way to go, let the ArubaOS CX 6300 handle it

upvoted 0 times

...

Lorean

2 months ago

Agreed, the third-party switches might not be able to handle the traffic prioritization

upvoted 0 times

...

Tuyet

3 months ago

I agree with Carissa, applying a port-access policy with QoS defined in the user role makes sense.

upvoted 0 times

...

Leota

3 months ago

This question is making my head spin! I'm just going to go with option B and hope for the best. At least it's not as complicated as option D.

upvoted 0 times

...

Chandra

3 months ago

Wait, did they say the customer is already using Aruba Gateway and third-party L2 switches? I guess option C is the way to go then, manually prioritizing the tunneled traffic on the third-party switches.

upvoted 0 times

Kandis

2 months ago

I agree, option A is the best solution for applying QoS user-based rules for the R&D client traffic.

upvoted 0 times

...

Elli

3 months ago

Option C is not the correct choice. We need to apply a QoS rule to the ArubaCX 6300 client port to classify traffic before it is tunneled.

upvoted 0 times

...

Kenny

3 months ago

Interesting, so I need to apply a port-access policy with QoS on the ArubaOS CX 6300 switch. Sounds like a solid solution to me.

upvoted 0 times

...

Lenna

3 months ago

Hmm, looks like I need to prioritize the tunneled traffic between the ArubaOS CX 6300 and the Aruba Gateway. I think option B is the way to go here.

upvoted 0 times

Valentin

3 months ago

That sounds like a good idea. It will help prioritize the tunneled traffic for the R&D client.

upvoted 0 times

...

Mozell

3 months ago

I think we should apply a port-access policy with QoS defined in the user role on the ArubaOS CX6300 switch.

upvoted 0 times

...

Carissa

3 months ago

I think option B is the correct answer.

upvoted 0 times

...