Cyber Monday 2024! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions

HP Exam HPE6-A69 Topic 3 Question 44 Discussion

Actual exam question for HP's HPE6-A69 exam
Question #: 44
Topic #: 3
[All HPE6-A69 Questions]

Refer to the exhibit.

You want to protect the aggregation layer if the VSXISL falls. Where should you place a VSX keepalive link?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: C

Contribute your Thoughts:

Joseph
2 months ago
B is the correct answer, my dudes. Gotta keep that aggregation layer happy and healthy, you know? Unless, of course, you're into the whole 'chaos and mayhem' thing. Then, by all means, go for C!
upvoted 0 times
...
Brent
2 months ago
Hah, I bet the answer is A. Who needs to protect the aggregation layer when you can just let the whole network go down? That'll really keep the admins on their toes!
upvoted 0 times
...
Pearly
2 months ago
C is the way to go! Using the OOBM ports ensures that the keepalive link is completely separate from the production traffic.
upvoted 0 times
Ezekiel
1 months ago
C) On the OOBM ports of both aggregation switches
upvoted 0 times
...
Amber
2 months ago
B) On a dedicated link created using port 1'1/48 of each aggregation switch
upvoted 0 times
...
Tasia
2 months ago
A) On VSX LAG 1
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Joanna
2 months ago
I agree with Arlean, having the keepalive link on the OOBM ports provides a separate management path for better protection.
upvoted 0 times
...
Amira
2 months ago
D seems like the obvious choice to me. Why would we use a dedicated link when we can just use the existing VSX LAG 101?
upvoted 0 times
Angelica
26 days ago
User 4: D) On VSX LAG 101
upvoted 0 times
...
Desmond
28 days ago
User 3: C) On the OOBM ports of both aggregation switches
upvoted 0 times
...
Devora
1 months ago
B) On a dedicated link created using port 1'1/48 of each aggregation switch
upvoted 0 times
...
Carlota
2 months ago
A) On VSX LAG 1
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Arlean
2 months ago
I think option C is the best choice, placing it on the OOBM ports of both aggregation switches.
upvoted 0 times
...
Tequila
3 months ago
I think the answer is B. A dedicated link between the aggregation switches is the best way to protect the aggregation layer if the VSXISL goes down.
upvoted 0 times
Elena
2 months ago
That makes sense, it would help protect the aggregation layer if the VSXISL fails.
upvoted 0 times
...
Rene
2 months ago
I agree, a dedicated link between the aggregation switches is the best option.
upvoted 0 times
...
Cortney
2 months ago
I think the answer is B.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Margret
3 months ago
I disagree, I believe it should be on a dedicated link created using port 1'1/48 of each aggregation switch.
upvoted 0 times
...
Linn
3 months ago
I think the VSX keepalive link should be placed on VSX LAG 1.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel
az-700  pass4success  az-104  200-301  200-201  cissp  350-401  350-201  350-501  350-601  350-801  350-901  az-720  az-305  pl-300  

Warning: Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at /pass.php:70) in /pass.php on line 77