Cyber Monday 2024! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions

HP Exam HPE6-A69 Topic 8 Question 36 Discussion

Actual exam question for HP's HPE6-A69 exam
Question #: 36
Topic #: 8
[All HPE6-A69 Questions]

The customer is already using Aruba Gateway and third-party L2 switches New ArubaOS CX 6300 switches have been deployed for R&D. which have a requirement for user profiling and tunneled traffic between ArubaOS CX 6300 and Aruba Gateway

What is required for this configuration to apply QoS user-based rules for the R&D client traffic?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: A

Contribute your Thoughts:

Fabiola
6 months ago
I'm with the rest of you. B is the clear winner here. Although, I do have to applaud the creativity of whoever came up with Option C. It's like they're trying to program the switches using a crystal ball or something.
upvoted 0 times
...
Ty
6 months ago
Haha, prioritizing IP protocol 47 traffic? What is this, the 90s? Option C is just a hot mess. Definitely go with B and keep it simple, folks.
upvoted 0 times
Luke
6 months ago
Applying QoS in the user role on the ArubaOS CX6300 switch is the way to go.
upvoted 0 times
...
Maurine
6 months ago
Yeah, let's stick with option B for simplicity.
upvoted 0 times
...
Eura
6 months ago
I agree, option C sounds outdated.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Carrol
7 months ago
I agree with Ernie. Option B is definitely the way to go. Trying to prioritize the tunneled traffic on the third-party switches sounds like a nightmare. Better to handle it all on the ArubaOS side.
upvoted 0 times
...
Ernie
7 months ago
Option B makes the most sense. Applying the QoS rules directly on the ArubaOS CX6300 switch is the way to go. Tunneling the traffic doesn't really matter as long as the QoS is set up properly.
upvoted 0 times
Remedios
6 months ago
B) Apply a port-access policy with QoS defined in the user role on the ArubaOS CX6300 switch
upvoted 0 times
...
Felton
6 months ago
That might work too, but having it on the ArubaOS CX6300 switch seems more straightforward.
upvoted 0 times
...
Alecia
6 months ago
D) Create a QoS policy for the UBT-client-VLAN traffic on the third-party switch.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lyla
6 months ago
I see what you mean, but applying it directly on the switch seems more efficient.
upvoted 0 times
...
Evette
6 months ago
A) Apply a QoS rule to the ArubaCX 6300 client port, lo classify traffic before it is tunneled.
upvoted 0 times
...
King
6 months ago
That sounds like the best option. It will ensure the QoS rules are applied directly where they are needed.
upvoted 0 times
...
Cordelia
6 months ago
Tunneling the traffic doesn't really matter as long as the QoS is set up properly.
upvoted 0 times
...
Kerry
6 months ago
Option B makes the most sense. Applying the QoS rules directly on the ArubaOS CX6300 switch is the way to go.
upvoted 0 times
...
Leonora
6 months ago
B) Apply a port-access policy with QoS defined in the user role on the ArubaOS CX6300 switch
upvoted 0 times
...
...

Save Cancel
az-700  pass4success  az-104  200-301  200-201  cissp  350-401  350-201  350-501  350-601  350-801  350-901  az-720  az-305  pl-300  

Warning: Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at /pass.php:70) in /pass.php on line 77