Cyber Monday 2024! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions

HP Exam HPE6-A78 Topic 4 Question 59 Discussion

Actual exam question for HP's HPE6-A78 exam
Question #: 59
Topic #: 4
[All HPE6-A78 Questions]

Refer to the exhibit.

A diem is connected to an ArubaOS Mobility Controller. The exhibit snows all Tour firewall rules that apply to this diem

What correctly describes how the controller treats HTTPS packets to these two IP addresses, both of which are on the other side of the firewall

10.1 10.10

203.0.13.5

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: C

Contribute your Thoughts:

Steffanie
3 months ago
I'm going with B. The firewall rules are the key, and the controller has to follow them, right?
upvoted 0 times
...
Beula
4 months ago
Haha, this question is a real head-scratcher. I bet the exam writer was having a laugh when they came up with this one.
upvoted 0 times
...
Deandrea
4 months ago
Easy peasy, the answer is B. The firewall rules are clear, and the question is asking about the controller's treatment of the packets.
upvoted 0 times
Vinnie
3 months ago
Great, we both got it right. The controller treats the packets based on the firewall rules.
upvoted 0 times
...
Sherell
3 months ago
Yes, that's correct. The firewall rules clearly show that. Good job!
upvoted 0 times
...
Justine
3 months ago
I think the answer is B as well. The controller permits the packet to 10.1.10.10 and drops the packet to 203.0.13.5.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Lino
4 months ago
Hmm, I'm a bit confused. The question says the exhibit shows the firewall rules, but I don't see any mention of the controller's behavior. I'll have to think about this one.
upvoted 0 times
Franklyn
2 months ago
Hyun: Oh, I see now. Thanks for clarifying!
upvoted 0 times
...
Franklyn
2 months ago
I agree with Franklyn, it's definitely option B.
upvoted 0 times
...
Hyun
3 months ago
No, I believe it permits the packet to 10.1.10.10 and drops the packet to 203.0.13.5.
upvoted 0 times
...
Barney
3 months ago
I think the controller drops both packets.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Emelda
4 months ago
I'm pretty sure it's C. The rules seem to permit both packets, so the controller should allow them through.
upvoted 0 times
Bambi
3 months ago
I agree, the rules do look like they permit both packets.
upvoted 0 times
...
Donte
4 months ago
I think you're right, C does seem like the correct answer.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Dean
4 months ago
Hmm, I see your point. It could make sense to permit both packets.
upvoted 0 times
...
Fernanda
4 months ago
I agree with Millie, I think both packets are permitted.
upvoted 0 times
...
Goldie
5 months ago
I think the answer is B. The exhibit shows that the firewall rules permit traffic to 10.1.10.10 but drop traffic to 203.0.13.5.
upvoted 0 times
Heike
3 months ago
The exhibit is clear, the controller treats HTTPS packets differently for the two IP addresses. It permits traffic to 10.1.10.10 but drops traffic to 203.0.13.5.
upvoted 0 times
...
Marquetta
3 months ago
Yes, that's correct. The firewall rules clearly show that traffic to 10.1.10.10 is permitted while traffic to 203.0.13.5 is dropped.
upvoted 0 times
...
Jerry
3 months ago
I agree with you, the controller permits the packet to 10.1.10.10 but drops the packet to 203.0.13.5.
upvoted 0 times
...
Annmarie
3 months ago
Yes, that's correct. Option B is the right answer.
upvoted 0 times
...
Felicidad
4 months ago
I agree, the firewall rules permit traffic to 10.1.10.10 but drop traffic to 203.0.13.5.
upvoted 0 times
...
Erick
4 months ago
I think the answer is B.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Dean
5 months ago
But why would it drop both? Maybe it permits one and drops the other.
upvoted 0 times
...
Millie
5 months ago
I believe it permits both packets.
upvoted 0 times
...
Dean
5 months ago
I think the controller drops both packets.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel
az-700  pass4success  az-104  200-301  200-201  cissp  350-401  350-201  350-501  350-601  350-801  350-901  az-720  az-305  pl-300  

Warning: Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at /pass.php:70) in /pass.php on line 77