Deal of The Day! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions

HP Exam HPE6-A79 Topic 5 Question 64 Discussion

Actual exam question for HP's HPE6-A79 exam
Question #: 64
Topic #: 5
[All HPE6-A79 Questions]

Refer to the exhibit.

A network administrator deploys a new Mobility Master (MM) - Mobility Controller (MC) network. To test the solution, the network administrator accesses the console of a pair of APs and statically provisions them. However, one of the APs does not propagate the configured SSIDs. The network administrator looks at the logs and sees the output shown in the exhibit.

Which actions must the network administrator take to solve the problem?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: D

Contribute your Thoughts:

Solange
17 days ago
Option C is the way to go, unless the network admin wants to end up in the AP witness protection program.
upvoted 0 times
...
Darci
19 days ago
I bet the network admin was hoping to just change the name and call it a day, but nope, gotta go with option C. Better luck next time, buddy!
upvoted 0 times
Carlota
1 days ago
User 2: Yeah, re-provisioning the AP with a different group and modifying the name in the whitelist should do the trick.
upvoted 0 times
...
Cordelia
2 days ago
User 1: Option C seems like the best choice here.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Pearly
1 months ago
This is a classic case of the AP not playing well with others. Option C is the way to fix it, no doubt!
upvoted 0 times
...
Emogene
1 months ago
I think we should re-provision one of the APs with a different name or modify the name in the whitelist.
upvoted 0 times
...
German
1 months ago
But what about modifying the name of one AP in the whitelist?
upvoted 0 times
...
Rutha
1 months ago
Ah, I see the issue. Modifying the name in the whitelist might not be enough, so I'd go with option C as well.
upvoted 0 times
Rebbecca
20 days ago
I agree, re-provisioning the AP with a different group should fix the problem.
upvoted 0 times
...
France
28 days ago
Option C seems like the best solution here.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Madonna
1 months ago
I disagree, I believe we should re-provision one of the APs with a different name.
upvoted 0 times
...
Rusty
2 months ago
Hmm, looks like the network admin needs to re-provision one of the APs with a different group. Option C seems like the way to go here.
upvoted 0 times
Shaun
12 days ago
User4: It's important to check the logs to troubleshoot these kinds of problems.
upvoted 0 times
...
Tony
13 days ago
User3: That makes sense, modifying the group could solve the issue.
upvoted 0 times
...
Louann
28 days ago
User2: Yeah, option C suggests re-provisioning the AP with a different group.
upvoted 0 times
...
Valentine
1 months ago
User1: I think the network admin should re-provision the AP with a different group.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
German
2 months ago
I think the correct action is to create another AP group in the MC's configuration.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel
az-700  pass4success  az-104  200-301  200-201  cissp  350-401  350-201  350-501  350-601  350-801  350-901  az-720  az-305  pl-300  

Warning: Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at /pass.php:70) in /pass.php on line 77