Cyber Monday 2024! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions

HP Exam HPE6-A84 Topic 3 Question 25 Discussion

Actual exam question for HP's HPE6-A84 exam
Question #: 25
Topic #: 3
[All HPE6-A84 Questions]

Refer to the exhibit.

Aruba ClearPass Policy Manager (CPPM) is using the settings shown in the exhibit. You reference the tag shown in the exhibit in enforcement policies related to NASes of several types, including Aruba APs, Aruba gateways, and AOS-CX switches.

What should you do to ensure that clients are reclassified and receive the correct treatment based on the tag?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer

Contribute your Thoughts:

Angella
3 months ago
I think option C makes the most sense, as it ensures clients are reclassified accurately based on the tag.
upvoted 0 times
...
Tyra
3 months ago
But wouldn't setting the Tags Update Action to No Action and enabling RADIUS CoAs be more efficient?
upvoted 0 times
...
Veronique
4 months ago
Haha, I'd love to see the faces of the NAS admins if we went with Option B. Bouncing switch ports might not be the most graceful solution, but it would certainly get their attention!
upvoted 0 times
Yuonne
3 months ago
Felice: Agreed, let's stick with enabling profiling in each service and setting the correct profiling action.
upvoted 0 times
...
Elina
3 months ago
We should probably go with a more subtle approach to ensure clients are reclassified correctly.
upvoted 0 times
...
Felice
3 months ago
Yeah, it would definitely cause some panic among the NAS admins.
upvoted 0 times
...
Eric
3 months ago
Haha, can you imagine if we actually bounced switch ports? That would be chaos!
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Fidelia
4 months ago
I disagree, I believe enabling profiling in each service with the correct action is the way to go.
upvoted 0 times
...
Raymon
4 months ago
I agree with Kenneth. Going with Option C is the most comprehensive solution to address the requirements of reclassifying clients based on the tag across different NAS types.
upvoted 0 times
Antonio
3 months ago
I think enabling profiling in each service is the best approach to ensure clients are reclassified correctly.
upvoted 0 times
...
Rolande
3 months ago
Option C is definitely the way to go. It covers all the different NAS types we have.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Tyra
4 months ago
I think we should change the RADIUS action to [Aruba Wireless -Terminate Session].
upvoted 0 times
...
Kenneth
4 months ago
Option C seems like the way to go. Enabling profiling in each service and setting the correct profiling action for each NAS type sounds like the best approach to ensure consistent client classification and treatment.
upvoted 0 times
Fidelia
4 months ago
Yes, enabling profiling for each service and setting the correct action for each NAS type should ensure accurate client treatment.
upvoted 0 times
...
Monte
4 months ago
I agree, option C seems like the most logical choice.
upvoted 0 times
...
...

Save Cancel
az-700  pass4success  az-104  200-301  200-201  cissp  350-401  350-201  350-501  350-601  350-801  350-901  az-720  az-305  pl-300  

Warning: Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at /pass.php:70) in /pass.php on line 77