Cyber Monday 2024! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions

HP Exam HPE6-A85 Topic 8 Question 30 Discussion

Actual exam question for HP's HPE6-A85 exam
Question #: 30
Topic #: 8
[All HPE6-A85 Questions]

You have been asked to troubleshoot failed connectivity between a local subnet in the HQ Office and a remote subnet in the Branch Office. PC1 is unable to ping PC2.

Use the provided topology and show command output to identify the reason for the failure:

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: D

Using the provided topology and show command output, it can be determined that L3-SW-2 in the Branch Office does not have a route to reach the subnet where PC1 resides (192.168.1.0/24 in the HQ Office). L3-SW-1 in the HQ Office has a route to the Branch Office subnet (172.16.1.0/24), but without the reciprocal route on L3-SW-2, traffic from the Branch Office will not be able to reach the HQ Office subnet, hence PC1 cannot ping PC2.


Contribute your Thoughts:

Dion
2 months ago
Yeah, D is definitely the issue here. Gotta love those pesky routing problems. At least it's not a hardware failure, that would be a real headache!
upvoted 0 times
...
Tu
2 months ago
Hah, I bet the network admin is kicking themselves for forgetting that static route. Hope they don't have to explain this one to the boss!
upvoted 0 times
Dottie
1 months ago
The network admin is definitely going to have some explaining to do.
upvoted 0 times
...
Kati
1 months ago
Yeah, that's probably why PC1 can't ping PC2. They need to fix that.
upvoted 0 times
...
Arlette
2 months ago
Looks like someone forgot to add a static route on the Branch Office switch.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Kanisha
2 months ago
That makes sense. Let's check the configuration on L3-SW-2 to see if that's the problem.
upvoted 0 times
...
Graham
2 months ago
I agree, D is the right answer. Without a static route, the Branch Office switch won't know how to reach the HQ subnet. Simple routing fix, but crucial for the connectivity.
upvoted 0 times
Jerry
2 months ago
Definitely, a simple routing fix can make a big difference in network connectivity.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lenita
2 months ago
So, adding a static route on the Branch Office switch should solve the problem.
upvoted 0 times
...
Dell
2 months ago
Yes, that's right. Without the static route, the connectivity between the subnets won't work.
upvoted 0 times
...
Margarita
2 months ago
I think the issue is with the Branch Office switch not having a static route to the HQ subnet.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Scot
3 months ago
I agree with you, Kanisha. Option A mentions that there is no Layer 3 SVI configured in the correct subnet on L3-SW-2.
upvoted 0 times
...
Arlene
3 months ago
The correct answer is D. The Branch Office L3-SW-2 switch doesn't have a static route to the HQ Office Local Subnet. The topology shows the networks are connected, but the routing configuration is missing.
upvoted 0 times
James
1 months ago
We should add a static route on the Branch Office switch to fix the connectivity problem.
upvoted 0 times
...
Elliott
1 months ago
That makes sense. Without the correct route, the packets won't be able to reach the destination.
upvoted 0 times
...
Catherin
1 months ago
Yes, I agree. The switch probably doesn't have a static route to the HQ Office subnet.
upvoted 0 times
...
Tawna
1 months ago
I think the issue is with the routing configuration on the Branch Office switch.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Kanisha
3 months ago
I think the issue might be on L3-SW-2 in the Branch Office.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel
az-700  pass4success  az-104  200-301  200-201  cissp  350-401  350-201  350-501  350-601  350-801  350-901  az-720  az-305  pl-300  

Warning: Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at /pass.php:70) in /pass.php on line 77