Cyber Monday 2024! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions

HP Exam HPE6-A85 Topic 9 Question 27 Discussion

Actual exam question for HP's HPE6-A85 exam
Question #: 27
Topic #: 9
[All HPE6-A85 Questions]

You are working with a pair of 6300M switches in a VSF stack. The switch has 48 SmartRate 5G ports, 2 SFP28 ports, and 2 SFP56 ports. Both SFP56 ports are used for stacking.

You need to provide an LACP connection to another identical stack with the maximum available bandwidth possible. What should you configure?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: A

To provide an LACP connection with the maximum available bandwidth, one should configure a link aggregation group (LAG) using all available ports that can be used for data transfer. Since the SFP56 ports are used for stacking, the next best option is to use the 2 SFP28 ports and as many SmartRate 5G (SR5) ports as possible on each switch, which would allow for a 16-member LAG, with 2 SFP28 and 6 SR5 ports on each switch contributing to the LAG.


Contribute your Thoughts:

Armanda
2 months ago
I'm going with Option B. It's a nice middle ground between the other options, and it still gives us a good amount of bandwidth.
upvoted 0 times
...
Mel
2 months ago
Ha! I bet the exam writer is really trying to trick us here. They're probably hoping we'll overthink this and pick the wrong answer.
upvoted 0 times
...
Desiree
2 months ago
I disagree. Option C seems more efficient to me. We only need to use 2 ports from each switch, which leaves us with more available ports for other connections.
upvoted 0 times
Gerald
1 months ago
I agree with Gerald, Option B seems like the most practical choice. We don't need to use all the ports for this connection.
upvoted 0 times
...
Leatha
1 months ago
Let's go with option C then. It's a good balance of bandwidth and port availability.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lindy
2 months ago
True, but with option C, we have more available ports for other connections.
upvoted 0 times
...
Louvenia
2 months ago
I disagree, I believe Option B is more efficient. Using 4 SR5 ports on each switch should be enough.
upvoted 0 times
...
Jina
2 months ago
But with option A, we can have a 16-member LAG for maximum bandwidth.
upvoted 0 times
...
Annmarie
2 months ago
Option C seems more efficient. We only need to use 2 ports from each switch.
upvoted 0 times
...
Linwood
2 months ago
I think Option A is the best choice. It gives us the most bandwidth with 16 ports in the LAG.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Jettie
3 months ago
I think option D might be too limiting in terms of bandwidth.
upvoted 0 times
...
Tori
3 months ago
I'm leaning towards option C, it seems like a balanced configuration.
upvoted 0 times
...
Noemi
3 months ago
Option A looks good to me. Using both the SFP28 ports and the SR5 ports will give us the maximum bandwidth possible for the LACP connection.
upvoted 0 times
Alethea
2 months ago
Yeah, Option A is the way to go for sure.
upvoted 0 times
...
Barrett
2 months ago
I think we should go with Option A as well, it seems like the most efficient configuration.
upvoted 0 times
...
Alba
2 months ago
Agreed, using both types of ports will definitely give us the most bandwidth.
upvoted 0 times
...
Mayra
2 months ago
Option A is the best choice for maximum bandwidth.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Hortencia
3 months ago
I disagree, I believe option B is the best choice.
upvoted 0 times
...
Jess
3 months ago
I think we should go with option A.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel
az-700  pass4success  az-104  200-301  200-201  cissp  350-401  350-201  350-501  350-601  350-801  350-901  az-720  az-305  pl-300  

Warning: Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at /pass.php:70) in /pass.php on line 77