Cyber Monday 2024! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions

HP Exam HPE7-A01 Topic 6 Question 26 Discussion

Actual exam question for HP's HPE7-A01 exam
Question #: 26
Topic #: 6
[All HPE7-A01 Questions]

You are building a configuration in Central that will be used for a standardized network design for small sites for your company, you want to use GUI configuration for gateways and Aps, while template configuration for switches. You need to align with Aruba best practices.

Which set of actions will satisfy these requirements?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer

Contribute your Thoughts:

Alton
2 months ago
Ooh, the old 'trick question' type of exam question. I'm going to have to think this one through carefully.
upvoted 0 times
Carissa
29 days ago
Hmm, I think option B makes the most sense. Separate groups for switches and APs/gateways with unique sites for each location.
upvoted 0 times
...
Rolland
1 months ago
B) Create one group in Central for switches and a second group for APs and gateways. Create a unique site for each location, and assign devices to the appropriate site.
upvoted 0 times
...
Sharan
2 months ago
A) Create one group in Central for switches a second group for APs. and a third group for gateways Create a unique site for each location, and assign devices to the appropriate site.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Raina
2 months ago
Ha, I bet the exam proctors would get a kick out of 'Create a single group in Central' as an option. Might as well throw in 'Use a magic wand to configure everything' while we're at it.
upvoted 0 times
...
Eugene
2 months ago
Option A looks good to me. Separating the devices into different groups will make it easier to manage and apply settings specific to each type of device.
upvoted 0 times
...
Mirta
2 months ago
I'm going with Option D. Creating a unique site for each type of device will give you more flexibility and control over the configuration.
upvoted 0 times
Desmond
1 months ago
That's true. It's important to follow best practices for a standardized network design.
upvoted 0 times
...
Kayleigh
1 months ago
I agree, having separate sites for each type of device makes it easier to manage.
upvoted 0 times
...
Juliana
1 months ago
Option D is a good choice. It will help keep things organized.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Alyce
2 months ago
Option B seems straightforward and aligns with Aruba's best practices. Separating switches from APs and gateways makes sense for a standardized network design.
upvoted 0 times
Wilbert
1 months ago
Definitely. It's all about efficiency and alignment with industry standards.
upvoted 0 times
...
Dalene
1 months ago
Creating unique sites for each location and assigning devices accordingly will help with organization.
upvoted 0 times
...
Raelene
2 months ago
I agree. It's important to follow Aruba's best practices for a standardized network design.
upvoted 0 times
...
Tayna
2 months ago
Option B seems like the best choice. It separates switches from APs and gateways.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Jesusa
3 months ago
I think option D could work too, as it separates devices by type for easier management.
upvoted 0 times
...
Elden
3 months ago
I'm not sure, but I think having separate groups for switches and APs/gateways makes sense.
upvoted 0 times
...
Merrilee
3 months ago
I disagree, I believe option B is more aligned with Aruba best practices.
upvoted 0 times
...
Leslie
3 months ago
I think option A is the best choice.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel
az-700  pass4success  az-104  200-301  200-201  cissp  350-401  350-201  350-501  350-601  350-801  350-901  az-720  az-305  pl-300  

Warning: Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at /pass.php:70) in /pass.php on line 77