Cyber Monday 2024! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions

HP Exam HPE7-A03 Topic 1 Question 14 Discussion

Actual exam question for HP's HPE7-A03 exam
Question #: 14
Topic #: 1
[All HPE7-A03 Questions]

'Don't Buy at Us' is a US-based retail company that is expanding Into Europe. They are expanding into EMEA with a regional headquarters called HQ2 inside The Netherlands.

Their US-based headquarters HQ1 was refreshed last year based on the Aruba ESP architecture. You have treated the design for HQ? based on the same design as HQ1. a two-tier architecture. The high level is shown below.

Switch BOM for this project based on Two Tier:

Collapsed Core: 2 x Aruba 8360-16Y2C in VSX (ISL 2 ICOG0E DAC)

Access Slack: 10 x Slack of Aruba 6200F 48G Class4 PoE 4SFP- 740W each stack has A members. VSF

with 10GbE VSF links) 12 x 10GbE uplink pet stack)

During the presentation of your design to the CTO of "Don't Buy at Us" you were informed about the changes they want you to incorporate into the updated design

1. HQ2 will include the EMEA regional distribution center (EMEA-OISTR) next to the HQ2.

2. Only two pairs of 0S1 are available between HQ2 and EMEA-DlSTR.

3. The uplinks from all access stacks need to increase to 2 x 25GbE. the fiber in HQ2 and EMEA-DI5TRI is certified for 25GbE.

4. EMEA-DlSTR needs at least 7 x stack of Aruba 48 ports switches (each stack has 4 members).

Which answer based on best practice is presenting the correct Switch BOM tor the updated design?

A)

B)

C)

D)

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: C

Based on the requirements provided by 'Don't Buy at Us,' the updated design needs to accommodate 25GbE uplinks and a minimum of 7 stacks of 48-port Aruba switches for the EMEA-DISTR. Option C is the most suitable based on best practices, as it proposes:

A core configuration consisting of two Aruba 8360-12C in VSX for the collapsed core with ISL of 2x100GbE DAC, which will provide robust core networking with high-speed interconnects, suitable for the demands of a regional distribution center and headquarters.

Aggregation with two stacks, each with 2 Aruba 8360-12C in VSX (ISL 2x100GbE DAC), accommodating the uplink capacity requirements.

Access stacks with a total of 17 stacks of Aruba 6300F 48-port 1GbE Class 4 PoE with 4-port SFP56 (each stack has 4 members, VSF with 50GbE VSF links, 2 x 25GbE uplinks per stack), which exceeds the minimum requirement of 7 stacks and provides the necessary uplink bandwidth.

This configuration supports the 25GbE uplink speeds, satisfies the required number of switch stacks for the EMEA distribution center, and is compatible with the existing 25GbE-certified fiber infrastructure at HQ2 and EMEA-DISTR.


Contribute your Thoughts:

Gearldine
4 months ago
Option B gets my vote. It's the only one that mentions the 25GbE fiber, which seems like an important detail to address.
upvoted 0 times
...
Pearline
4 months ago
This design question is a real brainteaser! I'm leaning towards Option A, but I wouldn't be shocked if the correct answer is something completely different.
upvoted 0 times
Terina
3 months ago
Great, Option A it is for the updated design of HQ2 and EMEA-DlSTR.
upvoted 0 times
...
Raylene
3 months ago
Option A it is then, let's go with that for the Switch BOM.
upvoted 0 times
...
Fausto
3 months ago
I agree, Option A aligns with the requirements for the updated design.
upvoted 0 times
...
Sol
3 months ago
Option A seems like the best choice based on the changes they want to incorporate.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Jesus
4 months ago
Haha, 'Don't Buy at Us' - that's a funny name for a retail company! Anyway, I think Option D covers all the bases, so that's my pick.
upvoted 0 times
Melita
3 months ago
Yeah, Option D looks like the most suitable one based on the changes they mentioned. It's the best fit for the updated design.
upvoted 0 times
...
Paris
4 months ago
I think Option D is the best choice as well. It seems to align with the updates they want for the design.
upvoted 0 times
...
Nieves
4 months ago
I agree, 'Don't Buy at Us' is quite a unique name for a retail company. Option D does seem to cover all the necessary changes they want to incorporate.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Tula
4 months ago
I agree with Robt, Option B seems to be the most suitable choice based on the requirements given.
upvoted 0 times
...
Marti
4 months ago
I'm going with Option C. The redundant links between HQ2 and EMEA-DISTR seem like a good way to handle the limited connectivity.
upvoted 0 times
...
Marge
4 months ago
Option B looks like the best choice to me. It addresses the additional requirements like the increased uplink speed and the EMEA distribution center.
upvoted 0 times
Verdell
3 months ago
Let's go with Option B for the updated Switch BOM design.
upvoted 0 times
...
Laura
3 months ago
The design in Option B definitely aligns with the updated requirements for HQ2 and EMEA distribution center.
upvoted 0 times
...
Kate
3 months ago
I agree, Option B seems to cover all the changes requested by the CTO.
upvoted 0 times
...
Laura
3 months ago
Option B looks like the best choice to me.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Robt
4 months ago
Option B includes the necessary switches for EMEA-DlSTR, which is a key requirement.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lashanda
5 months ago
Why do you think Option B is better?
upvoted 0 times
...
Robt
5 months ago
I disagree, I believe Option B is the best choice.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lashanda
5 months ago
I think the correct answer is Option A.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel
az-700  pass4success  az-104  200-301  200-201  cissp  350-401  350-201  350-501  350-601  350-801  350-901  az-720  az-305  pl-300  

Warning: Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at /pass.php:70) in /pass.php on line 77