Cyber Monday 2024! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions

HP Exam HPE7-A03 Topic 1 Question 23 Discussion

Actual exam question for HP's HPE7-A03 exam
Question #: 23
Topic #: 1
[All HPE7-A03 Questions]

'Don't Buy at Us' is a US-based retail company that is expanding Into Europe. They are expanding into EMEA with a regional headquarters called HQ2 inside The Netherlands.

Their US-based headquarters HQ1 was refreshed last year based on the Aruba ESP architecture. You have treated the design for HQ? based on the same design as HQ1. a two-tier architecture. The high level is shown below.

Switch BOM for this project based on Two Tier:

Collapsed Core: 2 x Aruba 8360-16Y2C in VSX (ISL 2 ICOG0E DAC)

Access Slack: 10 x Slack of Aruba 6200F 48G Class4 PoE 4SFP- 740W each stack has A members. VSF

with 10GbE VSF links) 12 x 10GbE uplink pet stack)

During the presentation of your design to the CTO of 'Don't Buy at Us' you were informed about the updated fiber infrastructure that Don't Buy at Us' has installed in HQ2.

The core stack is Installed in the MDF and per IOF there is one access stack installed. Based on best practice, what is the most cost-effective update to the switch BOM?

A)

B)

C)

D)

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: B

Option B is the most cost-effective solution, as it does not include long-range optics, which are unnecessary given the distances and fiber types specified. The 10GbE-SR optics are suitable for short-range connections up to 300 meters over OM3 fiber and would cover the needs of the longest fiber run mentioned, which is 250 meters. The 10GbE-LRM optics, while capable of reaching up to 220 meters over OM2 fiber, would not be necessary as the longest OM2 run is 71 meters, which is within the range of standard 10GbE-SR optics. Thus, Option B provides the required connectivity without incurring additional costs for long-range optics that are not needed given the fiber infrastructure of HQ2.


Contribute your Thoughts:

Laurel
1 months ago
I'm torn between B and C. On one hand, B is the cheapest, but C offers that extra layer of resilience. Decisions, decisions... This is like choosing between a cheap sandwich or an overpriced artisanal one. Tough life.
upvoted 0 times
Murray
8 days ago
In the end, it all comes down to what the priorities are for the company. Cost savings or extra protection?
upvoted 0 times
...
Heike
14 days ago
I agree, it's like choosing between a cheap sandwich or an overpriced artisanal one. Both have their pros and cons.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lenita
23 days ago
Option B is definitely the cheaper choice, but Option C does provide more resilience. It's a tough decision.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Cecil
1 months ago
Hmm, Option D seems the most future-proof, but is it really necessary for this project? I don't want to overengineer and blow the budget. Maybe Option A is the sweet spot.
upvoted 0 times
Raymon
19 days ago
Let's go with Option A to stay within budget and meet the project requirements.
upvoted 0 times
...
Casie
21 days ago
We should consider the long-term scalability of the solution.
upvoted 0 times
...
Keshia
22 days ago
Option A could be the best balance between cost and performance.
upvoted 0 times
...
Leslie
1 months ago
I agree, Option D might be overkill for this project.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Lonna
1 months ago
I disagree, I believe Option C would be the most cost-effective choice.
upvoted 0 times
...
Merilyn
2 months ago
I'm going with Option C. Gotta love that redundancy, even if it costs a bit more. Reliability is key, especially for a growing company like 'Don't Buy at Us'.
upvoted 0 times
...
Amie
2 months ago
I think we should go with Option A for the switch BOM update.
upvoted 0 times
...
Tamera
2 months ago
Option B looks like the most cost-effective solution, with the fewest changes to the original design. Who doesn't love a good bargain, am I right?
upvoted 0 times
Malcom
29 days ago
Definitely, going with Option B is a win-win situation for both functionality and cost.
upvoted 0 times
...
Malcom
1 months ago
I think sticking with Option B is a smart move, especially when it comes to budget considerations.
upvoted 0 times
...
Jutta
1 months ago
Yeah, Option B keeps things simple and doesn't stray too far from the original design.
upvoted 0 times
...
Shenika
1 months ago
I agree, Option B seems like the best choice for cost-effectiveness.
upvoted 0 times
...
...

Save Cancel
az-700  pass4success  az-104  200-301  200-201  cissp  350-401  350-201  350-501  350-601  350-801  350-901  az-720  az-305  pl-300  

Warning: Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at /pass.php:70) in /pass.php on line 77