Cyber Monday 2024! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions

HP Exam HPE7-A03 Topic 2 Question 20 Discussion

Actual exam question for HP's HPE7-A03 exam
Question #: 20
Topic #: 2
[All HPE7-A03 Questions]

You are delivering a replacement collapsed core network proposal to the customer where the core switches will have the switched virtual interlaces (SVl) configured. The customer is not sure that a USX pair of switches will Be able to act as I tie spanning tree root in their environment.

Which options are true about spanning tiee and VSX that will help assure the customer that a VSX pair of switches are appropriate for a collapsed core? (Select two.)

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: D, E

According to Aruba Campus Access documents and learning resources, Aruba VSX (Virtual Switching Extension) technology is designed to provide advanced high availability and redundancy features for campus networks. Specifically, answer D is correct because Aruba VSX supports both Multiple Spanning Tree Protocol (MSTP) and Rapid Per VLAN Spanning Tree (RPVST), ensuring efficient tree structures for VLANs and rapid convergence in case of topology changes. Answer E is also true as the Inter-Switch Link (ISL) used for the VSX pair is not part of the Spanning Tree Protocol (STP) domain, meaning it does not send or receive Bridge Protocol Data Units (BPDUs). This design prevents the ISL from influencing STP calculations, ensuring that the operational roles of the primary and secondary switches in the VSX pair are clear and predictable to the rest of the network. This separation helps maintain deterministic behavior and failover capabilities in the network, aligning with the goals of a collapsed core network design.


Contribute your Thoughts:

Weldon
2 months ago
D is also a good option. The VSX switches support both MSTP and RPVST, so they should be able to handle the customer's STP requirements.
upvoted 0 times
...
Devorah
2 months ago
Haha, I bet the customer is wondering if the VSX switches will be able to handle their core network without a 'core' meltdown!
upvoted 0 times
...
Kaycee
2 months ago
I'm not sure about B, since I thought the LAG operation was active-active, not both switches being 'operational primary'.
upvoted 0 times
Izetta
1 months ago
C) Both VSX switches are configured with the system MAC and then create unique STP bridge-IDs to identify 'operational primary' and 'operational secondary' for proper STP functioning.
upvoted 0 times
...
Corrinne
2 months ago
A) The primary vsx switch ts the spanning tree root and the default behavior is the links on the secondary vsx switch are blocked with sub-millisecond failover assured by vsx active-gateway.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Christiane
2 months ago
A and E seem like the right choices here. The primary VSX switch acts as the STP root, and the ISL between the VSX switches is not part of the STP domain, so the failover should be seamless.
upvoted 0 times
Josefa
29 days ago
A) Definitely, with the primary VSX switch as the STP root and the ISL not part of the STP domain, the failover should be seamless.
upvoted 0 times
...
Jacquelyne
1 months ago
Customer: That makes sense. It seems like the VSX pair of switches will work well for our collapsed core network.
upvoted 0 times
...
Kandis
1 months ago
E) The ISL between VSX switches is never part of STP domain and doesn't send or receive BPDUs on this link, ensuring the 'operational primary' and 'operational secondary' switches are deterministic to other dual-attached switches.
upvoted 0 times
...
Sherrell
1 months ago
A) The primary VSX switch is the spanning tree root and the default behavior is the links on the secondary VSX switch are blocked with sub-millisecond failover assured by VSX active-gateway.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Pura
2 months ago
That's a good point, Jennifer. It's important for the customer to understand how VSX switches work with spanning tree.
upvoted 0 times
...
Jennifer
3 months ago
I agree with you, Pura. Option E also makes sense because the ISL between VSX switches is not part of the STP domain.
upvoted 0 times
...
Pura
3 months ago
I think option A is true because the primary VSX switch is the spanning tree root.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel
az-700  pass4success  az-104  200-301  200-201  cissp  350-401  350-201  350-501  350-601  350-801  350-901  az-720  az-305  pl-300  

Warning: Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at /pass.php:70) in /pass.php on line 77