Cyber Monday 2024! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions

HP Exam HPE7-A03 Topic 3 Question 15 Discussion

Actual exam question for HP's HPE7-A03 exam
Question #: 15
Topic #: 3
[All HPE7-A03 Questions]

A global cruise line company needs to refresh its current fleet. They win refresh the insides' of the ship to be cost-effective and increase their sustain ability. They Mill replace the complete WLAN/LAN hardware of the ship. In this refresh, the company will not refresh Us current security requirements. The CIO also wants to limit the number of unused ports in the switches. Future expansion will always mean a refresh of hardware. They start with the smallest ship with a maximum of 800 guests

Each ship has a LAN infrastructure consisting of two core switches, up to 10 redundant distribution switches, and up to 500 access switches (400 cabins. 100 technical rooms). The Core switches are located in the MDF of the ship and the distribution switches are located in the IDFs of the ship. Each cabin and technical room gets one single access switch.

The cabling structure of the ship will not be refreshed. Each IDF is connected to the MDF by SMF. of which two pairs are available for the interconnect between the core and distribution. The length of SM fiber between MDF and IDF is less than 300 meters (930 ft) and the type used is 0S1. Each cabin is connected by a single 0M2 pair to the IDF. the maximum length is 60 meters (200 ft). Each technical room is connected by a single 0M2 pail to the IDF. with lengths between 100 and 150 meters (320 and 500 ft).

For each cabin/technical room the customer is looking to replace their current fan-less 2530/2540 without changing the requirements, except they need to upgrade the uplink to distribution switch to 10GbEto handle the increased network traffic, and the technical rooms need redundant power.

The WLAN infrastructure will be 1:1 refreshed without new cabling or new AP locations. Their WLAN Infrastructure is based on the 200/300 series Indoor and outdoor APs running instantOS (less than 300 APs). the customer has no change in WLAN requirements.

The cruise line company will replace its current Internet connection before the LAN/WLAN refresh. The new Internet connection will provide a 99.8% uptime, which is needed to ensure the paid guest Wi-Fi is always operational. With this new internet connection, the CIO of the cruise line wants to base the design on the ESP architecture from Aruba because Internet connection is guaranteed.

Based on the best practices, what should you recommend as the most cost-effective switch model for the cabins?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: A

For the cabin switches in the global cruise line's fleet refresh project, the most cost-effective switch model that meets the requirement for fan-less operation, 10GbE uplink capability, and PoE support is the HPE Aruba Networking 6200F 12G Class4 PoE 2G/2SFP+. This switch model offers a compact form factor with sufficient port density for cabin connectivity, Power over Ethernet for powering devices directly through the network cable, and SFP+ ports for high-speed uplink connections to the distribution switches. This choice is in line with the company's aim to upgrade the network infrastructure to handle increased traffic while maintaining a focus on cost-effectiveness and sustainability. The 6200F series is designed for exactly such environments, providing reliable performance and energy efficiency, which is crucial for the limited space and power availability in a ship setting.


Contribute your Thoughts:

Katina
3 months ago
That's a good point, I see your rationale. Option C might indeed be the most cost-effective switch model for the cabins.
upvoted 0 times
...
Azzie
3 months ago
But option C has more PoE ports and SFP+ ports, which would be beneficial for the cabins' network requirements.
upvoted 0 times
...
Katina
3 months ago
I disagree, I believe option A) HPE Aruba Networking 6200F 12g Class4 PoE 2G/2SFP+ would be the best choice for cost-effectiveness.
upvoted 0 times
...
Jani
4 months ago
Dude, the cruise line wants to be 'cost-effective' and 'sustainable'. The 6100 126 Class4 PoE 26/2SFP+ seems like the perfect balance.
upvoted 0 times
...
Leonor
4 months ago
Haha, who needs 'best practices' when you can just go with the cheapest option? 6000 126 Class4 PoE 2G/2SFP all the way!
upvoted 0 times
Melynda
2 months ago
Definitely, no need to overcomplicate things when the cheaper option works just fine.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lore
3 months ago
It's all about being cost-effective, right?
upvoted 0 times
...
Bernardo
3 months ago
Exactly! The 6000 126 Class4 PoE 2G/2SFP seems like the way to go.
upvoted 0 times
...
Louis
3 months ago
I agree, why spend more when you can go with the cheapest option?
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Azzie
4 months ago
I think the most cost-effective switch model for the cabins would be option C) HPE Aruba Networking 6100 126 Classd PoE 26/2SFP+.
upvoted 0 times
...
Kenneth
4 months ago
The 6200F 12g Class4 PoE 2G/2SFP+ is overkill for the cabins. We don't need all those extra ports.
upvoted 0 times
Bulah
3 months ago
Maybe we should go with the 6100 246 Class4 PoE 45FP+ instead.
upvoted 0 times
...
Gerardo
3 months ago
I agree, the 6200F 12g Class4 PoE 2G/2SFP+ is too much for the cabins.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Susana
4 months ago
The 6100 246 Class4 PoE 45FP+ seems like the best option. It has the required uplink and redundant power for the technical rooms.
upvoted 0 times
Lemuel
4 months ago
The 6100 126 Classd PoE 26/2SFP+ might be a good choice as well, considering the requirements for the cabins.
upvoted 0 times
...
Silvana
4 months ago
I think the 6200F 12g Class4 PoE 2G/2SFP+ could also be a cost-effective option for the cabins.
upvoted 0 times
...
Amie
4 months ago
I agree, the 6100 246 Class4 PoE 45FP+ is a good choice for the technical rooms.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Maarten Bourdois
4 months ago
The correct answer is C. The Aruba CX6100 12G complies to the following requirements: 1. It has a 10Gb uplink (CX6000 doesn't) 2. It is fanless 3. It is the most cost effective 4. The EOS list advices a CX6000 as a replacement for a 2530. But since a 10Gb UL interface is required, the most cost effective solution is a CX6100. 5. The 2530 is a fanless 8 port switch. The CX6100 12G is also a fanless 12 port switch Although the CX6200F can be used, it is not the most cost effective solution therefore disqualifying it as a correct answer.
upvoted 1 times
...

Save Cancel
az-700  pass4success  az-104  200-301  200-201  cissp  350-401  350-201  350-501  350-601  350-801  350-901  az-720  az-305  pl-300  

Warning: Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at /pass.php:70) in /pass.php on line 77