Cyber Monday 2024! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions
Mail Us support@pass4success.com
Location PL
Mob_nav_barsMENU

HP Exam HPE7-A04 Topic 2 Question 1 Discussion

Actual exam question for HP's HPE7-A04 exam
Question #: 1
Topic #: 2
[All HPE7-A04 Questions]

You are adding EVPN VXLAN to an L3 spine and leaf topology that uses OSPF for the underlay. You plan to use a single BGP AS. Which design for EVPN neighbors is correct?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: C

by Novella at Sep 21, 2024, 07:09 PM

Limited Time Offer

25%

Off

Get Premium HPE7-A04 Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF

Contribute your Thoughts:

Submit Cancel
Lenna
1 months ago
Option A all the way! Keeping it simple with just the leaf switches is the way to go. Plus, who needs route reflectors when you've got VXLAN loopback IPs, am I right? *wink wink*
upvoted 0 times
...
Joni
1 months ago
D) Leaf switches should establish iBGP sessions with spine switches on their actual P2P link IP addresses. Route reflectors are not required - Really? Establishing sessions with the spine switches directly? That seems a bit counterintuitive to me.
upvoted 0 times
Felton
12 days ago
D) Leaf switches should establish iBGP sessions with spine switches on their actual P2P link IP addresses. Route reflectors are not required
upvoted 0 times
...
Felicidad
23 days ago
C) At least one spine switch should act as route reflector and specify the leaf switches' unique loopback IPs as route reflector clients
upvoted 0 times
...
Ilene
25 days ago
B) The border leaf switches should act as route reflectors and specify the leaf switches' VXLAN loopback IPs as route reflector clients
upvoted 0 times
...
Minna
1 months ago
A) Leaf switches should establish iBGP sessions with other leaf switches using their VXLAN loopback IPs. Route reflectors are not required
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Caren
2 months ago
B) The border leaf switches should act as route reflectors and specify the leaf switches' VXLAN loopback IPs as route reflector clients - Border leaf switches as route reflectors? That's an interesting approach. I wonder if it would add any extra overhead though.
upvoted 0 times
Laurel
18 days ago
Overall, it's a valid design option that can work well in many scenarios.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lemuel
1 months ago
Using VXLAN loopback IPs as route reflector clients can simplify the configuration and management of the network.
upvoted 0 times
...
Leota
1 months ago
It can help with scalability and reduce the number of iBGP sessions leaf switches need to establish.
upvoted 0 times
...
Delsie
1 months ago
It's a common design choice to use border leaf switches as route reflectors in EVPN VXLAN setups.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Evangelina
2 months ago
C) At least one spine switch should act as route reflector and specify the leaf switches' unique loopback IPs as route reflector clients - Hmm, using the spine as a route reflector could work, but do I really want to add that extra complexity?
upvoted 0 times
Josue
26 days ago
C) At least one spine switch should act as route reflector and specify the leaf switches' unique loopback IPs as route reflector clients
upvoted 0 times
...
Diane
1 months ago
B) The border leaf switches should act as route reflectors and specify the leaf switches' VXLAN loopback IPs as route reflector clients
upvoted 0 times
...
Leigha
1 months ago
A) Leaf switches should establish iBGP sessions with other leaf switches using their VXLAN loopback IPs. Route reflectors are not required
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Claudia
2 months ago
I think option D is the best choice. Leaf switches should establish iBGP sessions with spine switches on their actual P2P link IP addresses. Route reflectors are not required.
upvoted 0 times
...
Gladys
2 months ago
I see your point, Charisse. But I think option C makes more sense. At least one spine switch should act as route reflector and specify the leaf switches' unique loopback IPs as route reflector clients.
upvoted 0 times
...
Charisse
2 months ago
I disagree, I believe option B is the right choice. The border leaf switches should act as route reflectors and specify the leaf switches' VXLAN loopback IPs as route reflector clients.
upvoted 0 times
...
Shaun
2 months ago
I think option A is correct because leaf switches should establish iBGP sessions with other leaf switches using their VXLAN loopback IPs.
upvoted 0 times
...
Zack
3 months ago
A) Leaf switches should establish iBGP sessions with other leaf switches using their VXLAN loopback IPs. Route reflectors are not required - This makes the most sense to me. Seems like a straightforward way to set up the EVPN neighbors.
upvoted 0 times
Xuan
2 months ago
Definitely, using the VXLAN loopback IPs for iBGP sessions helps optimize the network connectivity in the spine and leaf architecture.
upvoted 0 times
...
Bernardine
2 months ago
I think it's important to ensure the leaf switches can communicate efficiently with each other in the EVPN setup.
upvoted 0 times
...
Ailene
2 months ago
Yes, it simplifies the configuration and eliminates the need for route reflectors in this design.
upvoted 0 times
...
Thersa
2 months ago
I agree, setting up iBGP sessions with other leaf switches using their VXLAN loopback IPs seems like the right approach.
upvoted 0 times
...
...

Save Cancel
az-700  pass4success  az-104  200-301  200-201  cissp  350-401  350-201  350-501  350-601  350-801  350-901  az-720  az-305  pl-300  

Warning: Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at /pass.php:70) in /pass.php on line 77