Cyber Monday 2024! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25%
- Ends In
00:00:00
Coupon code:
SAVE25
X
Welcome to Pass4Success
Login
|
Sign up
-
Free
Preparation Discussions
Mail Us
support@pass4success.com
Location
PL
MENU
Home
Popular vendors
Salesforce
Microsoft
Nutanix
Cisco
Amazon
Google
CompTIA
SAP
VMware
Oracle
Fortinet
PeopleCert
Eccouncil
HP
Palo Alto Networks
Adobe
ISC2
ServiceNow
Dell EMC
CheckPoint
Discount Deals
New
About
Contact
Login
Sign up
Home
Discussions
HP Discussions
Exam HPE7-A04 Topic 4 Question 6 Discussion
HP Exam HPE7-A04 Topic 4 Question 6 Discussion
Actual exam question for HP's HPE7-A04 exam
Question #: 6
Topic #: 4
[All HPE7-A04 Questions]
In a multi-AS underlay design
A
All spine switches are in the same AS while each leaf (VSX pair if used) are in their own AS
B
Every spine and every leaf is in their own AS
C
All spine and leaf switches are in one AS and the border leaf is in separate AS
D
Every spine is in their own AS while all leaf switches in one AS
Show Suggested Answer
Hide Answer
Suggested Answer:
A
by
Theron
at
Oct 22, 2024, 09:03 PM
Limited Time Offer
25%
Off
Get Premium HPE7-A04 Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF
Contribute your Thoughts:
Submit
Cancel
Olive
16 days ago
Option C? Really? That's like saying 'this is a wrong answer' for a multiple-choice question. Come on, these exam writers need to up their game!
upvoted
0
times
...
Dana
17 days ago
Option B is the way to go. Using eBGP or iBGP gives you flexibility in the underlay design. As long as it works, who cares which one you use, right?
upvoted
0
times
...
Bernardine
21 days ago
Hmm, I'm not sure. This question seems a bit tricky. Option A or B could work, depending on the specific requirements.
upvoted
0
times
...
Vernice
22 days ago
I think Option D is correct. iBGP should be used for the underlay routing in a multi-AS environment.
upvoted
0
times
Kenny
11 days ago
I think Option D is correct. iBGP should be used for the underlay routing in a multi-AS environment.
upvoted
0
times
...
...
Alberta
1 months ago
Option B is the correct answer. Using either eBGP or iBGP for the underlay routing in a leaf and spine topology is a valid design.
upvoted
0
times
Francesco
22 days ago
Exactly, having the option to choose between eBGP and iBGP is beneficial.
upvoted
0
times
...
Mari
29 days ago
That makes sense, it gives flexibility in the design.
upvoted
0
times
...
Corazon
1 months ago
Yes, you can use either eBGP or iBGP for underlay routing in a leaf and spine topology.
upvoted
0
times
...
Elvis
1 months ago
I think option B is the correct answer.
upvoted
0
times
...
...
Bettyann
1 months ago
I disagree, iBGP can also work in this design
upvoted
0
times
...
Lisandra
2 months ago
I think we should use eBGP for underlay routing
upvoted
0
times
...
Log in to Pass4Success
×
Sign in:
Forgot my password
Log in
Report Comment
×
Is the comment made by
USERNAME
spam or abusive?
Commenting
×
In order to participate in the comments you need to be logged-in.
You can
sign-up
or
login
Save
Cancel
az-700
pass4success
az-104
200-301
200-201
cissp
350-401
350-201
350-501
350-601
350-801
350-901
az-720
az-305
pl-300
Olive
16 days agoDana
17 days agoBernardine
21 days agoVernice
22 days agoKenny
11 days agoAlberta
1 months agoFrancesco
22 days agoMari
29 days agoCorazon
1 months agoElvis
1 months agoBettyann
1 months agoLisandra
2 months ago