Cyber Monday 2024! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions

HP Exam HPE7-A07 Topic 1 Question 13 Discussion

Actual exam question for HP's HPE7-A07 exam
Question #: 13
Topic #: 1
[All HPE7-A07 Questions]

You want to configure an MTU of 9198 for a routed lag interface on a CX 6300 switch. Which configuration achieves this?

A)

B)

C)

D)

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: A

In the context of ArubaOS-CX, particularly with the 6300 series switches, setting the MTU on a routed Link Aggregation Group (LAG) interface requires the interface lag id command in the configuration, specifying the LAG interface you're configuring. The ip mtu command is then used to set the desired MTU size for that LAG. Option A correctly shows this configuration process, where the MTU is set to 9198 for the LAG interface, in line with the requirements for routing larger frames, which could be necessary for certain applications or data flows that require jumbo frames.

The information related to the configuration of Aruba switches is consistent with the principles and guidelines found in the technical documentation for the ArubaOS-CX 6300 series switches, which emphasizes the importance of correct MTU settings for network performance and stability.


Contribute your Thoughts:

Natalie
5 months ago
Option C is the way to go. Though I have to say, the thought of configuring an MTU of 'nighty-nighty' is making me chuckle.
upvoted 0 times
Tarra
4 months ago
Emogene: Let's go with Option C then. It's the right choice for the routed lag interface.
upvoted 0 times
...
Justine
5 months ago
Agreed, the configuration in Option C will set the MTU to 9198 as needed.
upvoted 0 times
...
Emogene
5 months ago
Haha, 'nighty-nighty' does sound funny! But it's important to configure it correctly.
upvoted 0 times
...
Wayne
5 months ago
Option C is the correct choice for configuring the MTU.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Blair
5 months ago
Option C has the correct MTU value of 9198 in the configuration.
upvoted 0 times
...
Cathrine
5 months ago
Why do you think Option C is correct?
upvoted 0 times
...
Tarra
5 months ago
My money's on Option A. Gotta keep those packets nice and compact, you know? No need for all that extra baggage.
upvoted 0 times
Truman
5 months ago
Yeah, Option A seems like the best choice for optimizing performance. Let's go with that.
upvoted 0 times
...
Marcos
5 months ago
I think Option A is the way to go too. Less overhead, more efficiency.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Galen
5 months ago
Option D, no doubt about it. Who doesn't love playing with jumbo frames on their switches? Plus, it's sure to impress the examiner.
upvoted 0 times
...
Sage
6 months ago
Ah, the classic 'bigger is better' mentality. I'd go with Option B - keeping the MTU at the default 1500 is the safe bet.
upvoted 0 times
Zack
5 months ago
Yeah, Option B seems like the way to go in this case.
upvoted 0 times
...
Daisy
5 months ago
I agree, sticking with the default MTU is usually the safer choice.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Blair
6 months ago
I disagree, I believe Option C is the right choice.
upvoted 0 times
...
Cathrine
6 months ago
I think the correct configuration is Option A.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lilli
6 months ago
Option C looks like the right choice to me. Setting the MTU to 9198 on the routed lag interface seems straightforward.
upvoted 0 times
Jess
5 months ago
Option C definitely stands out as the right option for configuring the MTU to 9198 on the routed lag interface.
upvoted 0 times
...
Percy
6 months ago
I think Option C is the best choice too. It looks like the most straightforward way to configure the MTU.
upvoted 0 times
...
Latosha
6 months ago
I agree, Option C seems to be the correct configuration for setting the MTU to 9198 on the routed lag interface.
upvoted 0 times
...
...

Save Cancel
az-700  pass4success  az-104  200-301  200-201  cissp  350-401  350-201  350-501  350-601  350-801  350-901  az-720  az-305  pl-300  

Warning: Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at /pass.php:70) in /pass.php on line 77