Cyber Monday 2024! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions

HRCI Exam SPHR Topic 1 Question 88 Discussion

Actual exam question for HRCI's SPHR exam
Question #: 88
Topic #: 1
[All SPHR Questions]

The doctrine of ________________ negligence was used to mitigate the employer's responsibility if the worker's actions contributed in any way to the injury.

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: A

The doctrine of contributory negligence was used to mitigate the employer's responsibility if the worker's actions contributed in any way to the injury.

Chapter: Risk Management

Objective: Risk Management


Contribute your Thoughts:

Lauran
2 months ago
I see both sides. It's a complex issue.
upvoted 0 times
...
Chandra
2 months ago
Contributory negligence? More like the employer's 'blame the victim' strategy.
upvoted 0 times
Ranee
1 months ago
Even if the worker was careless, the employer should still ensure safety measures are in place.
upvoted 0 times
...
Cherelle
1 months ago
But what if the worker was being careless?
upvoted 0 times
...
Brinda
2 months ago
I agree, the employer should still take responsibility for providing a safe work environment.
upvoted 0 times
...
Mable
2 months ago
Exactly, it's unfair to shift all the blame onto the worker.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Sarina
2 months ago
I disagree. Employers should have a duty to ensure a safe working environment regardless of worker actions.
upvoted 0 times
...
Nydia
3 months ago
I think it's a fair concept. Workers should take some responsibility for their actions.
upvoted 0 times
...
Rosio
3 months ago
Contributory negligence, huh? Sounds like a fancy way of saying 'we're not responsible, you are'.
upvoted 0 times
Kenny
2 months ago
It's definitely a controversial doctrine that has been debated in legal circles for a long time.
upvoted 0 times
...
Jarod
2 months ago
Exactly, it's a way for employers to avoid full responsibility for workplace accidents.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lashaun
2 months ago
So the employer can argue that the worker's negligence played a role in causing the injury.
upvoted 0 times
...
Marvel
2 months ago
Yeah, it basically means that if the worker was partially at fault for their own injury, the employer's liability is reduced.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Deeanna
3 months ago
Ah, yes, the 'it's-your-fault-even-if-it's-really-ours' doctrine. Classic.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lauran
3 months ago
What do you think about the doctrine of contributory negligence?
upvoted 0 times
...
Reita
3 months ago
Contributory negligence? More like the employer's get-out-of-jail-free card!
upvoted 0 times
Brice
3 months ago
It definitely seems unfair to put the blame on the worker in those situations.
upvoted 0 times
...
Coleen
3 months ago
I agree, it can be unfair to workers who are injured on the job.
upvoted 0 times
...
Billye
3 months ago
Exactly! It's a way for employers to avoid full responsibility.
upvoted 0 times
...
Willow
3 months ago
Exactly! It's a way for employers to avoid full responsibility.
upvoted 0 times
...
...

Save Cancel
az-700  pass4success  az-104  200-301  200-201  cissp  350-401  350-201  350-501  350-601  350-801  350-901  az-720  az-305  pl-300  

Warning: Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at /pass.php:70) in /pass.php on line 77