Deal of The Day! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions

Huawei Exam H12-111_V2.5 Topic 7 Question 67 Discussion

Actual exam question for Huawei's H12-111_V2.5 exam
Question #: 67
Topic #: 7
[All H12-111_V2.5 Questions]

NB-loT evaluates network coverage by the following () KPI?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: B

Contribute your Thoughts:

Rene
6 days ago
I heard NB-IoT stands for 'Needs Broader Internet of Things' coverage. Gotta catch 'em all, right?
upvoted 0 times
...
Jeffrey
8 days ago
I believe RSRP is the correct answer because it measures the signal strength, which is crucial for network coverage assessment.
upvoted 0 times
...
Kirk
11 days ago
PSM? Is that some kind of power nap for network devices? I'll stick with the real stuff, thanks.
upvoted 0 times
...
Eleonore
12 days ago
Overlapping coverage? Sounds like a tango dance move, not a network metric. I'll pass on that one.
upvoted 0 times
...
Gary
14 days ago
I'm not sure, but I think it might be C) Overlapping coverage.
upvoted 0 times
...
Rasheeda
17 days ago
SINR, that's the one! It's all about the signal-to-noise ratio, keeping those pesky interferences at bay.
upvoted 0 times
Essie
2 days ago
A) RSRP
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Alecia
21 days ago
I agree with Sophia, RSRP is a key KPI for evaluating network coverage.
upvoted 0 times
...
Dyan
24 days ago
RSRP, definitely the way to go. It's like measuring the strength of a Wi-Fi signal, but for NB-IoT. Easy peasy!
upvoted 0 times
Daniel
14 days ago
I agree, RSRP is like the Wi-Fi signal strength for NB-IoT networks.
upvoted 0 times
...
Kirby
15 days ago
RSRP is definitely important for evaluating network coverage in NB-IoT.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Sophia
1 months ago
I think the answer is A) RSRP.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel
az-700  pass4success  az-104  200-301  200-201  cissp  350-401  350-201  350-501  350-601  350-801  350-901  az-720  az-305  pl-300  

Warning: Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at /pass.php:70) in /pass.php on line 77