Huawei Exam H12-831_V1.0 Topic 8 Question 58 Discussion

Actual exam question for Huawei's H12-831_V1.0 exam

Question #: 58
Topic #: 8

In the multi-level RR scenario, a large number of secondary RRs will be connected to the primary RR, which may lead to BGP of the primary RR. The routing table overflows, what method can be used to reduce the risk of overflowing the routing table of the advanced RR BGP?

AORF

Broute aggregation

Crouting control

Dset the sameCluster-ID

Show Suggested Answer

Suggested Answer: B

by Donte at Sep 17, 2024, 08:35 PM

Limited Time Offer

25%

Off

Get Premium H12-831_V1.0 Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF

Contribute your Thoughts:

Submit Cancel

Dylan

2 months ago

Hey, I heard the primary RR was really feeling the heat from all those secondary RRs. Maybe we should just tell it to take a nice, long vacation. That would solve the problem, right?

upvoted 0 times

Frankie

19 days ago

C) routing control

upvoted 0 times

...

Karl

22 days ago

B) route aggregation

upvoted 0 times

...

Stephaine

1 months ago

A) ORF

upvoted 0 times

...

Helga

2 months ago

ORF? Really? That's just the Outbound Route Filtering feature, not the solution to this problem. Gotta go with B) route aggregation on this one.

upvoted 0 times

Rebeca

29 days ago

User 3: Agreed, route aggregation is the method to reduce the risk of overflowing the routing table of the advanced RR BGP.

upvoted 0 times

...

Gracie

1 months ago

User 2: Gracie is right. B) route aggregation is the way to go in this scenario.

upvoted 0 times

...

Junita

1 months ago

ORF? Really? That's just the Outbound Route Filtering feature, not the solution to this problem.

upvoted 0 times

...

Nickolas

3 months ago

D) set the sameCluster-ID seems like a weird choice. How is that going to help with the routing table overflow issue? I'm sticking with B) route aggregation.

upvoted 0 times

James

2 months ago

B) Yeah, route aggregation seems like the most practical solution in this scenario.

upvoted 0 times

...

Britt

2 months ago

C) Routing control might provide some additional options for managing the routing table.

upvoted 0 times

...

Vicente

2 months ago

B) Agreed, route aggregation can definitely help in reducing the size of the routing table.

upvoted 0 times

...

Rosendo

2 months ago

A) ORF could also be a good option to consider.

upvoted 0 times

...

Denny

3 months ago

The correct answer is B) route aggregation. That's the best way to reduce the risk of overflowing the routing table of the advanced RR BGP in a multi-level RR scenario.

upvoted 0 times

Lorenza

3 months ago

B) route aggregation

upvoted 0 times

...

Jesusita

3 months ago

A) ORF

upvoted 0 times

...

Portia

3 months ago

I'm not sure, but I think C) routing control could also be a valid method to reduce the risk.

upvoted 0 times

...

Douglass

3 months ago

I'm going with C) routing control. It sounds like it could help manage the large number of secondary RRs and prevent the routing table from overflowing.

upvoted 0 times

...

Audra

3 months ago

I agree with Brittni, route aggregation can help reduce the risk of overflowing the routing table.

upvoted 0 times

...

Brittni

3 months ago

I think the answer is B) route aggregation.

upvoted 0 times

...