Cyber Monday 2024! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions

Huawei Exam H12-891_V1.0 Topic 4 Question 56 Discussion

Actual exam question for Huawei's H12-891_V1.0 exam
Question #: 56
Topic #: 4
[All H12-891_V1.0 Questions]

As shown in the figure, the PPP link between R1 and R2 is not in the same network segment, but the R1 and R2 direct connectors can communicate, and the Ethernet link cannot communicate under the same planning, why?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: B, D

Contribute your Thoughts:

Kattie
2 months ago
Option D makes the most sense to me. No need for Ethernet when the routers can talk directly over the PPP link. Gotta love those networking shortcuts!
upvoted 0 times
...
Marilynn
2 months ago
D is the way to go. PPP links can communicate directly without the overhead of Ethernet headers and ARP. Saves a lot of time and resources.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lucy
2 months ago
Haha, the question is so confusing, I feel like I need a Ph.D. in networking to understand it. But I'll go with D, it sounds the most logical.
upvoted 0 times
Denny
14 days ago
Mindy: Let's go with option D then.
upvoted 0 times
...
Vanesa
17 days ago
User 3: I think so too, option D seems logical.
upvoted 0 times
...
Jose
22 days ago
User 3: I think D is the correct answer too.
upvoted 0 times
...
Mindy
1 months ago
User 2: Yeah, I think option D makes the most sense.
upvoted 0 times
...
Maryann
1 months ago
User 2: Yeah, D seems like the right choice.
upvoted 0 times
...
Christiane
1 months ago
User 1: I agree, D does sound logical.
upvoted 0 times
...
Stephaine
1 months ago
I agree, this question is really confusing.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Arleen
2 months ago
I think the answer is C. The LCP protocol allows the interconnect ports to learn the MAC addresses of the other end, so no ARP is needed.
upvoted 0 times
Osvaldo
2 months ago
D) The data packets of the interconnect POS ports of R1 and R2 do not need to encapsulate ethernet headers and do not need to use ARP to request MAC addresses
upvoted 0 times
...
Jutta
2 months ago
C) The interconnect POS port of RI and R2, through LCP learns the MAC address of the opposite termination , does not need to use ARP to request the MAC address
upvoted 0 times
...
Frank
2 months ago
B) The interconnect POS ports of R1 and R2 learn the 32-bit host route for each other's direct connections through IPCP
upvoted 0 times
...
Lauran
2 months ago
A) The interconnect POS ports of R1 and R2 learn the 24-bit subnet route of each other's direct connection ports through IPCP
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Claudia
3 months ago
The correct answer is D. The PPP links between R1 and R2 do not need to use Ethernet headers or ARP since they communicate directly at the network layer.
upvoted 0 times
Mitzie
2 months ago
C) The interconnect POS port of RI and R2, through LCP learns the MAC address of the opposite termination , does not need to use ARP to request the MAC address
upvoted 0 times
...
Alease
2 months ago
B) The interconnect POS ports of R1 and R2 learn the 32-bit host route for each other's direct connections through IPCP
upvoted 0 times
...
Agustin
2 months ago
A) The interconnect POS ports of R1 and R2 learn the 24-bit subnet route of each other's direct connection ports through IPCP
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Martin
3 months ago
Interesting point, Reuben. But I still think option A makes more sense in this scenario.
upvoted 0 times
...
Reuben
3 months ago
I disagree, I believe the correct answer is D) The data packets of the interconnect POS ports of R1 and R2 do not need to encapsulate ethernet headers and do not need to use ARP to request MAC addresses.
upvoted 0 times
...
Martin
3 months ago
I think the answer is A) The interconnect POS ports of R1 and R2 learn the 24-bit subnet route of each other's direct connection ports through IPCP.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel
az-700  pass4success  az-104  200-301  200-201  cissp  350-401  350-201  350-501  350-601  350-801  350-901  az-720  az-305  pl-300  

Warning: Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at /pass.php:70) in /pass.php on line 77