Cyber Monday 2024! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions

Huawei Exam H19-435_V1.0 Topic 3 Question 12 Discussion

Actual exam question for Huawei's H19-435_V1.0 exam
Question #: 12
Topic #: 3
[All H19-435_V1.0 Questions]

OceanStor 100D objects are incorrectly described as QoS and Asynchronous Capability

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: B

Contribute your Thoughts:

Annamae
5 months ago
I think option C) QoS settings based on bucket and user granularity are supported makes sense too.
upvoted 0 times
...
Gregoria
5 months ago
Option D, support for 1-to-1 and 1-to-many? That's like asking me to choose between chocolate and vanilla ice cream. They're both delicious, but option C is the real deal!
upvoted 0 times
Tess
3 months ago
Definitely, option C provides more granularity for QoS settings.
upvoted 0 times
...
Paris
3 months ago
I agree, option C seems like the best choice for QoS settings.
upvoted 0 times
...
Ciara
3 months ago
Option D sounds great, but I think option C is the way to go.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lacey
3 months ago
Definitely, option C provides more granularity for QoS settings.
upvoted 0 times
...
Shaunna
3 months ago
I agree, option C seems like the best choice for QoS settings.
upvoted 0 times
...
Sharan
4 months ago
Option D sounds interesting, but I think option C is the way to go.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Ashlyn
5 months ago
I believe the correct answer is A) Support QoS settings for bandwidth and TPS.
upvoted 0 times
...
Marjory
5 months ago
I agree, it seems like there may be some confusion in the description.
upvoted 0 times
...
Ashleigh
5 months ago
Haha, who cares about QoS when you can have redundancy through EC? Option B is the way to go! Asynchronous Capability? More like Asynchronous Confusion!
upvoted 0 times
...
Chantell
5 months ago
I'm not sure about the other options, but I know for sure that option C is the right one. The question is straightforward.
upvoted 0 times
Keneth
4 months ago
I think option D is the right one, it mentions support for 1-to-1 and 1-to-many.
upvoted 0 times
...
Laurel
4 months ago
Option C is the correct answer, it supports QoS settings based on bucket and user granularity.
upvoted 0 times
...
Luis
4 months ago
I believe option B is the right choice, it mentions intra-DC and cross-DC redundancy through EC.
upvoted 0 times
...
Jordan
4 months ago
I think option A is correct, it supports QoS settings for bandwidth and TPS.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Timothy
5 months ago
Option C is clearly the correct answer. QoS settings based on bucket and user granularity are supported by OceanStor 100D objects.
upvoted 0 times
Luisa
4 months ago
That's good to know. It's important to have that level of control over QoS settings.
upvoted 0 times
...
Paola
4 months ago
Option C is definitely the right choice. QoS settings based on bucket and user granularity are supported.
upvoted 0 times
...
Filiberto
5 months ago
I agree, that's a key feature of OceanStor 100D objects.
upvoted 0 times
...
Tashia
5 months ago
Option C is definitely the right choice. QoS settings based on bucket and user granularity are supported.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Elroy
6 months ago
I think the OceanStor 100D objects are incorrectly described as QoS and Asynchronous Capability.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel
az-700  pass4success  az-104  200-301  200-201  cissp  350-401  350-201  350-501  350-601  350-801  350-901  az-720  az-305  pl-300  

Warning: Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at /pass.php:70) in /pass.php on line 77